A photo of the South Brisbane Councillors appears in “The Queenslander” 8 Dec 1900
Alderman Philip Nott, back row, 2nd from right
From the early 1880’s until his forced retirement in 1903, Philip Nott was committed to working for the community of South Brisbane, firstly on the Woolloongabba Divisional Board as part of the Brisbane Municipality, and then as an alderman on the newly independent South Brisbane Municipal Council following its separation from the Brisbane City Council in 1888. He worked tirelessly for his electorate and the South Brisbane area as their elected representative, in conjunction with the numerous boards and committees on which he sat as outlined in the previous chapter. Given he also ran his own business as a building contractor, he must have had enormous energy. One wonders how he found time for his wife Martha and large family.
Philip Nott was obviously an opinionated and strong minded individual which, at times, led to some confrontation with other aldermen. He was not universally popular amongst his council peers, and even his election as mayor in 1899 was not without controversy. The following year, he and another alderman had a public falling out with the new mayor over money to be spent on Federation celebrations.
Philip held conservative views about the liquor laws about which he campaigned strongly, and appears to have disagreed with the federation of the states in January 1901 which he and others thought would be detrimental to the state of Queensland. He played a leading role in the separation of the South Brisbane/Woolloongabba Division from the Brisbane Municipal Council and the formation of the independent South Brisbane Municipal Council in 1888. Although still willing to serve, Philip's final defeat in 1903 was a result of a campaign aimed at introducing new young blood into the council.
Philip held conservative views about the liquor laws about which he campaigned strongly, and appears to have disagreed with the federation of the states in January 1901 which he and others thought would be detrimental to the state of Queensland. He played a leading role in the separation of the South Brisbane/Woolloongabba Division from the Brisbane Municipal Council and the formation of the independent South Brisbane Municipal Council in 1888. Although still willing to serve, Philip's final defeat in 1903 was a result of a campaign aimed at introducing new young blood into the council.
History of municipal matters in South Brisbane
When Brisbane was first established, development mainly occurred on the northern side of the Brisbane River. Some areas south of the river, including the wards of South Brisbane and Kangaroo Point also began to develop. The Queensland Government passed the Divisional Boards Act of 1879 which established a system of Divisional Boards which were intended to administer areas with lower and more sparse populations than that of a municipality, for the purpose of providing local government and public services such as roads, bridges, public health (water, sanitation and drainage) and public amenities such as parks and cemeteries. The Woolloongabba Divisional Board was established on 9 January 1800. Between 1880 and 1888 the Division of Woolloongabba grew rapidly, so the Divisional Board members agitated to become an independent municipality from the Brisbane Municipal Council- the Municipal Council of South Brisbane came into being on 7 January 1888. The Municipality was divided into four wards with the local ratepayers electing the aldermen to represent them, and the aldermen then elected one of their number in February each year to be mayor. This was frequently a contentious issue when alderman could not agree on whose turn it was to be mayor.
In 1891, work commenced on the construction of the South Brisbane Municipal Chambers, containing offices for municipal officials and aldermen, and was officially opened on 1 July 1892. It was constructed in a prominent position in Vulture Street at a final cost of £11,000 and was described as “one of the most ornate and elegant buildings in the city”, and was in use as the Council Chambers until 1925 when the South Brisbane Council was amalgamated into the City of Great Brisbane.
In 1891, work commenced on the construction of the South Brisbane Municipal Chambers, containing offices for municipal officials and aldermen, and was officially opened on 1 July 1892. It was constructed in a prominent position in Vulture Street at a final cost of £11,000 and was described as “one of the most ornate and elegant buildings in the city”, and was in use as the Council Chambers until 1925 when the South Brisbane Council was amalgamated into the City of Great Brisbane.
Stanley Street South Brisbane c 1887
View of South Brisbane c.1895
Summary of career as an alderman:
December 1881- appointed as a member of the Woolloongabba Local Board of Health
March 1882- elected as member of the Woolloongabba Divisional Board
1883- chairman of Woolloongabba Divisional Board
1884-1887- Continued as Woolloongabba Divisional Board member
1888- First Municipal Council of South Brisbane- elected as alderman
(Source: Brisbane Courier Mon 28 July 1924 p40- Commemorative edition)
March 1890- returned as alderman (stated in election speech that he had been connected with municipal matters for some 12 or 15 years)
1891- continued as alderman
1892- retired from the election as there was a mistake made with a rates bill that was unpaid and some doubt whether he could legally sit if elected
1893- re-elected as alderman
1894-1895- re-elected as alderman
1896- stood for Mayor but defeated 5 to 7
1897-1898- re-elected as alderman
1899- elected as Mayor of South Brisbane
1900-1902 re-elected as alderman
1903- defeated in election and retired (election speech, stated he had represented the electorate for 21 years on the South Brisbane Council and the Woolloongabba Board.
South Brisbane Town Hall c. 1892
The following newspaper articles outline his long political career.
Brisbane Courier, Sat 31 Dec 1881 p6.
Official Notifications (From Today’s Government Gazette)
P. Nott, to be a member of the Woolloongabba Local Board of Health, in the room of E. Ross, resigned.
Brisbane Courier, Sat 11 March 1882 p.6
Divisional Boards- Woolloongabba
The board held its regular fortnightly meeting on Thursday evening last, when there were present- Henry Maynard, in the Chair; Messrs. Thomas Weedon, Philip Nott, John Hardgrave, John Drake, A Crump, D. Sinclair, and James Heaslop
Brisbane Courier, Sat 16 Dec 1882 p.6
Woolloongabba Divisional Board
The above board held their regular fortnightly meeting on Thursday Evening last:
Present- Messrs Henry Maynard (in the chair), Thomas Weedon, D. Sinclair, J. Hardgrave, P. Nott, J. Drake, A Crump, and the secretary.
(Discussion of contractors and tenders)
The Improvements Committee’s report for the past fortnight was laid before the board, showing there are three gangs of men employed in No. 1 subdivision- one gang constructing culvert and approaches in Jane-street, between Montague-road and the river (where it is intended shortly to establish a ferry); one gang, excavations and forming Blakeney-street, between Highgate Hill and Gladstone-road; the gang widening culvert and filling up footpath on the north side of Jane-street. Also that the contractor for excavations and forming Hardgrave-road and Vulture-street is progressing satisfactorily with his work. Two gangs of men are employed in No. 2 subdivision; one large job has been completed, being excavation and forming parts of Hawthorne-street and Merton-road, at a cost of £228. This work was tendered fro; the lowest the board received for the work was £305. Taking into consideration the extra work that has been performed on this job, the board have effected a saving of £100. The men in this subdivision are now engaged in repairing the roads damaged by the storm on the 12th December. One gang of men are employed in No. 3 subdivision, on general repairs and preparing logs for a culvert to be erected in Waterloo-street (continuation of Stanley-street). One gang of men employed on the Ipswich-road- general repairs….
Mr Nott reported on behalf of No. 1 Improvement Committee, that the petitions from residents of Camberwell Hill Estate for improvements to Stephens-street had been considered and the clerk instructed to have them carried out with as little delay as possible. A tracing of the locality was now laid on the table, showing that before a road with an easy grade could be made for the benefit of this district, giving access to the Brighton-road, several allotments of land would have to be purchased, and unless the residents were prepared to pay one-half of the purchase-money the board would take no action.
On the consideration of business from last meeting, the Chairman requested some member to move that the motion standing ion his name in reference to the construction of tramways be further adjourned until next meeting, pending the action of the Brisbane municipality in dealing with the construction of tramways within the city. Resolved, on the motion of Mr Nott, that the motion stand so adjourned.
Notice of motion Mr Nott, seconded by Mr Weeden” That this board take the necessary steps to provide for the health of the division”.
Resolved o the motion of Mr Nott-
"That the clerk be instructed to caution Mr Soden, omnibus proprietor, against over crowding his Highgate Hill busses; also against allowing passengers to smoke on the box to the discomfort and danger of lady passengers, and that he be requested to put on sufficient busses to meet the wants of the district.”
Brisbane Courier, 5 Feb 1883 P.1
Woolloongabba Division
Annual Elections
I hereby give notice that an Election will be held, closing at 1 pm on Wednesday 11th February next, for the return of one member each for Subdivision Nos. 1 and 2 of the Woolloongabba Division
The following are the Candidates Nominated
No 1 sub-division:
Philip Nott
George Henry Rose
No 2 Sub-division
Thomas Weedon
‘Michael Lowry
William Stepmore
Signed Returning Office
Woolloongabba 24th January 1883
The Queenslander, Sat 3 March 1883 p347
DIVISIONAL BOARDS
WOOLLOONGABBA
The usual fortnightly meeting of the above board was held on the 22nd ultimo. There were present- Messrs Drake, P. Nott, Dr Prentice, Maynard, D. Sinclair, Heaslop, Crump, Stephens and J. Hardgrave. This being the first meeting of the board since the annual election, the chair was taken by Mr Hill, the clerk to the board.
The election of a chairman was then proceeded with, and Dr Prentice proposed that Mr P. Nott (NO. 1 subdivision) be chairman for the ensuing year. Mr Crump seconded the motion. Mr Hardgrave cordially supported the proposal, which was carried unanimously.
The following return of the statistics of the division was read:- Area of division, 2066 acres; number of swellings, 1342; number of ratepayers, 2181; estimate capital value of freehold property, £583,670; the net annual value of the ratepayers property was £29,183; the total amount of assessment payable £1459.3s.6d. The receipts from Government were £3477 19s. 6d.; total, £4972 1s.2d. The expenditure was – on public works £4627 9s; interest on loan, £23 5s. 9d.; office expenses and salaried £396. 14s. 4d.; other expenses, £122 3s. 4d.; total, £5169 12s. 5d. The total amount of outstanding loans ws £779 11s.8d. on 31st December.
The salaries of the officers of the board were fixed at the same rate as last year, and the usual committees appointed.
Brisbane Courier, Fri 1 June 1883 p.5
Woolloongabba Divisional Board
The usual fortnightly meeting of the above board’s offices, when the following were present:
P. Nott, Esq. (chairman), Messrs, John Drake, John Hardgrave, J. Heaslop, W. Maynard, D. Sinclair, and Wm Stephens
Correspondence was read of which the following is of importance: Outwards: From the chairman, Mr P. Nott, to his worship the mayor of Brisbane, with reference to the maintenance of the boundary roads between the municipality and the Wooloongabba division, pointing out that according to the definitions published in the Government Gazette, dated 30th October 1880, the whole of the boundary roads lying east of Stanley Street, at its intersection with Vulture-street, are placed under the control of the Woolloongabba division, while those lying west of the same are placed under the control of the municipality. The letter proceeded to show that when the board took charge of their portion of the boundary roads they were so bad as to be dangerous to traffic and caused several accidents. The board had expended over £400 in putting their portion of the boundary roads in a passable condition, and were prepared to spend more when necessary; at the same time they objected to pay for their own half and half of the portion placed under the control of the municipality. In conclusion, the letter formally requested the municipality, on behalf of the Woolloongabba Divisional Board, to put the boundary roads under its jurisdiction in the condition fit for traffic with as little delay as possible.
Some discussion took place with reference to the chairman’s letter to the municipality, in which it was stated that if any accidents happened owing to the bad state of the roads lying west of Stanley-street, at its intersection with Vulture-street, the municipality would be soely and entirely responsible. Etc. etc.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 10 January 1884 p5
THE SOUTH BRISBANE RAILWAY
A deputation from the Woollongabba Divisional Board, consisting of Mr P. Nott (chairman) and Messrs Hardgrave, Stephens and Mr Hill, the clerk of the board, waited on the Minister for Works yesterday at 11 am. With reference to the proposed deviation of the South Brisbane Railway.
Mr S. Fraser, M.L.A. for South Brisbane in introducing the deputation, said that he knew the Minister’s time was valuable, and therefore he would be brief….. The main point of the divisional board’s complaint was the objectionable course at present taken by the line. Within a radius of half-a-mile there were no less than four level crossings, and these were on roads which there was a very large amount of traffic. The proposed deviation might be a costly undertaking, but he had no hesitation in saying that the costs that would accrue to the Government on account of compensation for accidents at the crossings would far outstrip anything the wished-for deviation was likely to cost. During the last session of Parliament the then Minister for Works laid on the table of the House papers and estimates showing it was the intention of the Government to carry out the line on the west side of the Ipswich road, but other matters pressed on the attention of the Government, and consequently the subject was never brought formally before the House.
The Minister for Works said it would save time if he stated that he had made a personal examination and inspection of this particular work. He had observed the four level crossings complained of, and had come to the conclusion that the wrong course for the railway had been adopted: but he would not do anything without consulting Parliament.
The only thing that could be done was to make the present laying down of the railway a temporary matter. His instructions to the surveyor relative to the proposed deviation would be to choose the best route for the line, quite irrespective of what land might be benefited or injured by it.
Mr Fraser said that he felt it due to the deputation to say that they had come simply in the interests of the public without any view of benefiting private persons by the proposed deviation of the railway.
Mr P. Nott said a survey of the deviation had been made beforehand, and as it was now practically admitted that the railway along the road would only be temporary, he would like to know why it should be made at all, causing expense to the Government and perhaps ruin to those before whose houses it passed. The deputation wished, if possible, that the proposed deviation should be brought before Parliament and assented to in the coming session. The distance it ran along the road was twenty-eight chains, and the proposed deviation would be about half-a-mile. If the deviation was to take place at all, the sooner it was accomplished the better.
The Minister said he would see what he could do about the matter, but there was other work to be done.
Mr Nott mentioned again that the deviation would only be about half-a-mile.
The Minister said he did not think there would be much difficulty in disposing of the matter this session. He would do what he could. For his part he did not see why the railway ever ran along the road as complained of.
The deputation then thanked the Minister for his courtesy and withdrew.
The Queenslander Sat 14 June 1884 p947
HOT-AIR ENGINE
An interesting and important ceremony took place at the rear of the Woolloongabba Divisional Hall on Saturday morning. The board decided some time ago to procure one of Bailey’s horizontal hot-air engines for the purpose of pumping water from the adjacent creek into tanks, from which the street watering cart may be supplied. This engine has been fitted up by Mr W. Clarke. It is of half-a-horse power, and exceedingly simple in construction and working. A brick stove, with proper appliances for self-cleaning, has been built, and the steel pot in which the air is heated is fixed in the brickwork at one end of the stove. The engine consists of a cylinder closed at one end by the steel pot referred to, and at the other by a piston. The cylinder is surrounded by a jacket, into which water is allowed to run to cool the air as it passes from the steel pot. The action of the loose-fitting piston causes the air to travel backwards and forwards. The alternate heating and cooling, or expansion and contraction of the air, does the whole business after one turn has been given to the driving wheel. The speed of the engine can be regulated by a speed-governor. The stove is provided with a roomy fireplace which will hold enough fuel to keep the engine going for three to six hours without stoking. The engine did its work admirably on Saturday, and readily pumped water from the creek into the tanks through suction and delivery pipes of 25 in. diameter. An excellent feature of the engine is that it requires no attention whilst in work, excepting an occasional feeding of the furnace. This latter will be done by the driver of the board’s water-cart. The start was made in the presence of Messrs John Hardgrave, Philip Nott, T. Heaslop, and G. Maynard, members of the board.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 22 June 1885 p5
MEETING OF BULIMBA RATEPAYERS
Pursuant to advertisement of the Bulimba ratepayers was held in the State School, Coorparoo, on Saturday afternoon, to consider the present unsatisfactory state of affairs in regard to the division. There were about 60 ratepayers present.
(Discussion of the matter which had resulted in the resignation of the members of the board, proceeded, one ratepayer, a Mr Brentnall describing the matter “to which he was referring could only characterised by one word- “fraud”.” He then read the following extract from the Colonial Treasurer’s letter of the 11th instant to the chairman of the Bulimba Board:- “The Colonial treasurer considers the conduct of these transactions to be highly discreditable and, while they may have guarded themselves from the consequences of proceedings in the criminal courts, he is confident the ratepayers of Bulimba, and the general public throughout the colony, will agree with him in the opinion that men who could sanction such grave irregularities with a view to defraud the State have forfeited the confidence of their constituents.” The Colonial Treasurer further said they “are unworthy to discharge the honourable duties attached to the office of public representatives.” Etc, etc
The present meeting was to take into consideration the character of the crisis and the division itself. If it were the opinion of the a majority of the ratepayers that the members who had represented the respective sub-divisions were all entitled to the full and entire confidence of their constituents let them be re-elected; but if it was the opinion of the ratepayers that they had forfeited that confidence, and that whilst no man would plead guilty they had all rendered themselves liable to suspicion, they should be rejected. Etc
(The issue was payment which was paid for work that had not been done.)
Mr P. Nott said that the evidence given by the clerk as reported in the Courier, and an extract of which the mover had just read, bore upon the face of it to anyone who was cognizant of divisional board work such an appearance of truth that it would be a very hard matter for the gentlemen named in that paragraph to persuade the people of Southern Queensland that it was not true. If proceedings of the king carried on by the Bulimba Board were allowed to go unchecked, it would be impossible to maintain the privilege which had been given to us of governing ourselves in local matters. He considered, however, that the ratepayers themselves were partly to blame for the disgrace which had fallen upon the board and the division, inasmuch as upon more that one occasion a seat on that board had been allowed to go begging. It was the duty of any gentlemen living in a division who could by any possible means spare the time to attend to the duties pertaining to local government to come forward when a seat was vacant. There was not nearly sufficient interest taken by the ratepayers in the actions of the members representing them, and this he considered was the peculiar danger attaching to the position of a member. If things did not materially change the government of the various districts would by and bye be allowed to get into the hands of men who would be guilty of very shady actions, and into the hands of cliques who would study only their own private interests and personal ends. He thoroughly endorsed the remarks which had been read by Mr Brentnall.
(Others speakers expressed their opinions and two resolutions carried.)
Brisbane Courier, Tues 19 January 1886 p5
DIVISIONAL BOARD NOMINATIONS
WOOLLOONGAQBBA
Nominations of candidates for the vacancies on the Woolloongabba Divisional Board, caused by the retirement of Messrs Philip Nott (No. 1 subdivision), Wm Stephens (No. 2 subdivision), and Henry Maynard, whose period of office has expired, were received by Mr Thos Heaslop, returning officer, at the offices of the board yesterday afternoon. The candidates nominated were Messrs Philip Nott, No 1 subdivision; William Stephens No 2 subdivision; and Casswell No. 3 subdivision. As only the required number of candidates have been nominated for these vacancies, the gentlemen named will be declared elected by the returning officer at noon today.
Brisbane Courier Mon 22 Feb 1886 p2,3
STARTLING
To the Editor of the Brisbane Courier
Sir- According to report in to-day’s issue of meeting of the Woolloongabba Divisional Board there are no less than four inspectors being employed night and day watching houses of ill-fame in only two of the roads in that division- namely, the Brighton-road and Hardgrave-road, taking down the names of those who visit there. I would ask, with this startling intelligence before me, why the many other well-known houses of ill-fame in the same division are not also watched night and day!
If they were, instead of four it would take forty quasi-detectives to do the work. I should also like to ask whether the ratepayers are aware of the expenditure being incurred in making black marks against the names of persons who have as much right to visit the houses in question as they have to frequent hotels and other well-known places, which are, of course, now largely resorted to for similar purposes.
Mr Philip Nott, a member of the board, has moved for a list of the names of visitors to these houses, and that the same be ready for next board meeting. Has he forgotten that the ratepayers who are not members of the board can also attend board meetings, and hear the names read over? And will it be legal or justifiable for those names to be made public in such a manner without being able to prove, or even if it could be proved, that each one so named had aided and abetted the keeper of the house of ill-fame in immoral proceedings? I think not. I think also the board had better consult their solicitor before that list does see the light of day- before it is made public.
Instead of licensing houses of ill-fame to which women who are really licensed go to meet the opposite sex, and keeping such houses well together in restricted, and suitable neighbourhoods, those of whom Mr Nott is a type have insisted on the keepers of these houses and the women frequenting them being hunted from place to place until they have become spread all over and all round Brisbane. By the action of these well-meaning, but foolish unpractical workers in the course of “social purity”, a social evil is being rapidly extended and greatly increased, whereas by enforcing common-sense workable regulations it might be checked and decreased.
It is high time there was some plain speaking about this matter; and I hope a much older pen than mine will write plainly about it, and about those who believe virtue can be insured by Act of Parliament, and vice there by buried in oblivion, and made an unutterable thing of the past. I am, sir &c.
Ratepayer
Brisbane Courier, Wed 23 June 1886 p5
WIDENING OF STANLEY-STREET
A DEPUTATION representing the Woolloongabba Divisional Board and ratepayers on the south side of the river waited upon the Minister for Lands yesterday for the purpose of inducing the Government to grant two portions of land abutting on Stanley-street for the widening of that thorough fare. The deputation consisted of Mr S. Fraser, M.L.A., Mr J Buckland, M.L.A. Mr W. Stephen chairman of the Woolloongabba Divisional Board, Mr P. Nott, Mr Casswell and Mr Hill, clerk to the Woolloongabba Divisional Board.
It was pointed out by Mr Fraser, Mr Stephen and Mr Nott, that the first piece of ground asked for was a strip running alongside the railway reserve, extending from Merton-road to Main-street. This formed part of the Woolloongabba recreation reserve, a portion for which had now been resumed by the Government for the use of the Railway Department. The piece asked for was half a chain in width, required to make Stanley-street a chain and a half wide. It had been originally granted for the purpose of widening the street, but it was resumed in 1880 by proclamation. It was now vested in the trustees for the Woolloongabba reserve. Along it shrubs had been planted, very nice and very beautiful, a member of the deputation said; but in view of the increasing traffic in Stanley-street the land was required for another purpose than mere ornament. The other strip of ground asked for was the same width running from the junction of Main-street and Ipswich-road with Stanley-street to the intersection of Wellington-road. This formed part of a property known as the water reserve, which was in the hands of the Government, and had not been resumed for any purpose. It was cut up during the time Mr Perkins was Minister for Lands, and was going to be sold. The street was then surveyed and left two chains wide. The sale did not take place, and the street was left only one chain wide. As three important thoroughfares each a chain and a half wide, Ipswich-road, Logan-road, and Main-street, converged upon Stanley-street near this point, and as Stanley-street had to carry the whole of the traffic of these three roads towards the town, it would be readily admitted that it was insufficient for the purpose, and there was no way of diverting the traffic from Stanley-street. If the Government granted the pieces of ground now asked for, the Woolloongabba Board, it was said, should endeavor to arrange with the owners of property between Merton-road and Vulture-street to widen the street there to a chain and a half. This would give a uniform width of a chain and a half all the way from Vulture=street to Wellington-street. During a conversation that followed the statement of the facts, it was remarked that the trustees of the Woolloongabba reserve would probably not object to the piece of ground under their jurisdiction being handed over, but whether the proposal would meet with any objection from the Railway Department it was impossible to say.
Me Dutton who appeared to regard the request in a favourable light, asked the deputation to submit their application in writing, accompanied by a plan of the streets and property, and give their reasons for asking for the land.
The deputation thanked the Minister and withdrew.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 30 June 1887 p5
MUNICIPAL SEPARATION
A meeting of ratepayers was held in the West End State school last night to consider the matter of the proposed division of the South Ward from the Municipality of Brisbane and its amalgamation with the Woolloongabba Division. Mr W. Stephens occupied the chair. There was a moderate attendance.
Mr P. Nott moved the first resolution- “That this meeting approves of the amalgamation of the South Ward with Woolloongabba Division, in order to constitute a separate municipality.” He said he thought the time would come when the South Brisbane electorate would be in one municipality. If they went up on to One-tree Hill and looked down they would see that a patch had been taken out of the district and tacked on to North Brisbane., On local political matters, the interests of the North and South Wards were nor identical, though he was prepared to admit they were on broad national questions. He pointed out that the argument against this movement, that South Brisbane being strongest, would absorb more than a due proportion of rates, might be met by financial separation. The interests of subdivision No. 1 of Wolloongabba and the South Ward were nearly identical; from their natural position they should work together. This would have to come to pass, or they would in time have to join the city. It was said that if they joined the South Ward they would have to bear their proportion of the debt, but he would point out on the other side that they would have a share of the assets, which more than covered the liabilities. The proportion of the debt they would have to bear would be £37,400 and their share of the properties would be£43,000. They need not be afraid of being saddled with any proportion of the debt. He intended to stick to the idea of a municipality for South Brisbane, and hoped to live to see it carried out. There were reasons other than financial why they should work together; the boundary roads now caused much trouble and were in a bad state. If those roads were simply between two wards there would be no difficulty in getting them looked after. Then there was the drainage. They were throwing their water at present into the municipal drains, but a set of aldermen might arise some day who would charge them a proportion of the cost of those drains.
Mr J. Drake seconded the resolution saying he thought the best thing they could do was to amalgamate with South Brisbane.
Mr Ramsey said he was sorry to see such a thin meeting. He favoured the proposed step.
Mr N Raven asked who were the promoters of the meeting? (Mr J. Hardgrave: “You’re not.”) Whoever they were he knew the time must come when the action in question now would be adopted. He complained that sufficient publicity had not been given to the meeting, and said the room should have been full. He considered it a good thing that they were not to be joined by Kangaroo Point, as their interests were quite opposed. On the drainage question alone the amalgamation should take place.
Mr Wendt said the meeting had been advertised in the three daily papers and posters had been put out.
Mr Nott pointed out that the meeting would not settle the whole question for the ratepayers. It would have to be settled by a petition signed by the majority of the ratepayers.
Mr John Hardgrave said he would be sorry to say the board and the municipality were antagonistic to each other, but difficulties had arisen about carrying out works. The drainage question, too, had to be settled. They should have the whole work under one head, and it would be done more cheaply and more expeditiously than under two bodies.
Mr Nicol Thompson regretted the small attendance, but was glad to see the matter in the hands of such capable men leading in the matter.
Mr J. McAndrew pointed out that they could get separation and amalgamation at the same time, but there was plenty of time for the wards to make up their minds while the South Ward was getting separation. He hoped they would all work well for the good of the electorate of South Brisbane, with the exception of Kangaroo Point, which they did not want.
The motion was unanimously carried amidst applause.
Mr Morey moved the second resolution- “That the following gentlemen be appointed a committee to assist in carrying out the foregoing resolution, namely- Messrs P. Nott, J. Drake, and the mover, with power to add to their number.” He heartily approved of the movement, though he was opposed to undue separation. This scheme was the amalgamation of an existing ward with an existing division. He was prepared to assist in collecting signatures to the petition for separation.
Mr N. Raven seconded the resolution
Mr Ramsay thought their affairs were not well governed by the Woolloongabba division, and he considered a shire council of five members would be more in the nature of a deliberative body.
The resolution was carried unanimously. The Chairman said the river, in his opinion, was the natural boundary, and he would like to see the separation and amalgamation carried out. There were rocks ahead, no doubt, but he trusted to the ability of the gentlemen who had the matted in hand to pull it through,
A vote of thanks to the chairman closed the proceedings.
Brisbane Courier, Wed 27 July 1887 p3
WOOLLOOGABBA DIVISIONAL BOARD
A special meeting of the above board was held yesterday morning in the board room, Woolloongabba, to consider a petition to the Governor-in-Council to bring the division under the Local Government Act. There were present- Messrs W. Stephens (chairman), P. Nott, J. Drake, T. Caswell, H. Baynes, J. Maynard, Thos Heslop, and A. Morry. The chairman explained the object of the meeting, and the clerk read the following petition:-
To his Excellency the Governor-in-Council.
May it please your Excellency,-
We, the board of the Division of Woolloongabba, do hereby respectfully petition your Excellency in Council to abolish the Division of Woolloongabba, and proclaim the same a municipality under the Local Government Act of 1878, under the name of the Borough of South Brisbane, by the powers vested in your Excellency as set forth in the 80th section of the Divisional Boards Act of 1879, and now designate the principal Act; such municipality to consist of three wards corresponding to our present subdivisions.
In support of this petition we would respectfully submit the following reasons:-
That when the division was first constituted in the year 1880, with a population of about 5000, the Divisional Board Act, which was passed more particularly for outside districts, fairly met our requirements.
That now, with a population of 15,000, we find this Act is in some important particulars unsuited to our circumstances which would, in our opinion, be more fully met by the Local Government Act of 1878.
That the board by the unanimous vote agreed to petition your Excellency for the alteration on our constitution.
That a public meeting of ratepayers convened by advertisement to consider this question was unanimously in favour of the same.
Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that your Excellency will be pleased to comply with our request.
And your petitioners as in duty bound will ever pray, &c.
The petition was signed by the chairman and clerk of the division.
After some little discussion as to the requirements of the Local Government Act, the Chairman proposed, Mr Nott seconded, and it was carried unanimously, that the common seal be affixed to the petition.
This was all the business of the special meeting, and the board went into committee.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 19 Sept 1887 p2
PUBLIC NOTICES
PROPOSED BOROUGH OF SOUTH BRISBANE
It is hereby notified, in pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act of 1878, that it is the intention of his Excellency the Governor-in-Council, three months after the publication hereof, to constitute the area comprised in the Divison of Woolloongabba and the South Ward of the Municipality of Brisbane a Municipal Borough, under the name of “The Borough of South Brisbane”
B.B. Moreton
Colonial Secretary’s Office
Brisbane 16th September 1887
Followed by
The Following petition from the Board of the Division of Woolloongabba praying for the constitution of the Division as a Municipal Borough, is published for general information
B.B. Moreton
To his Excellency the Governor-in-Council.
May it please your Excellency
We, the Board of the Division of Woolloongabba, do hereby respectfully petition your Excellency-in-Council to abolish the Division of Woolloongabba and proclaim the same a Municipality, under the Local Government Act of 1878, under the name of the Borough of South Brisbane, by the powers vested in your Excellency, etc, etc signed W. Stephens Chairman and John Hill Clerk
The following Petition from ratepayers in the South Ward of the Municipality of Brisbane praying that that Ward and the Division of Woolloongabba may be constituted a Municipal Borough is published for general information
B B. Moreton
We, the undersigned ratepayers of the South Ward of the Brisbane Municipality, do hereby respectfully petition your Excellency in Council to sever the said Ward from the Municipality of Brisbane, with a view to incorporating with the Woolloongabba Division, in order to constitute a separate Municipality to be called South Brisbane, etc. etc.
Signed
Luya, Stanley-street, South Brisbane
Robert Porter Stanley-street…..
Philip Nott, Cordelia-street
This is followed by many pages containing hundreds of names….
Brisbane Courier, Sat 26 January 1889 p3
NOMINATIONS
SOUTH BRISBANE
The following nominations were received for South Brisbane
No 1 Ward
Philip Nott, nominated by A.J. Thynne, T. Rees, A. Morry, B. James, W. Evans, and others.
Arthur Morry nominated by P. Nott, P. Aston, W. Hockings, J. Buckeridge, O Smith and others.
(plus several other nominees)
The Queenslander, Sat 9 Feb 1889 p225
SOUTH BRISBANE
The South Brisbane elections took place yesterday, and resulted in the return of the following candidates:- No 1 Ward, Messrs Morry, Drake and Hardgrave; No 2 Ward Messrs Stephens, Scanlan and Heaslop, etc.
The following is a return of the votes polled:-
No 1 Ward
Arthur Morry (retiring member) 342
John Drake (retiring member 324
John Hardgrave (retiring member) 247
Henry Manton 243
Philip Nott (retiring member) 230
N. Raven 179
Thos Lee 133
James Webb 118
Brisbane Courier, Wed 1 May 1889 p6
THE MAYORS OF ADELAIDE AND WOOLLAHRA ENTERTAINED
Their Worships Alderman j. Shaw (mayor of Adelaide) and Alderman J. Neild (mayor of Woollahra) were yesterday entertained to luncheon by the corporation of South Brisbane in the Council Chambers Stanley-street. In the absence from town of his worship the Mayor (Alderman W. Stephens), the chair was occupied by Alderman J. Kennedy and there were also present: His Worship the Mayor of Brisbane (Alderman Galloway), Mr a F. Luya M.L.A. Mr W Dav\y, P.M., Mr P. Nott, Aldermen Hardgrave, Drake, Losa, Blocksidge, Midson, Caswell, Heaslop, and Jones, Mr Hill (town clerk) and Mr Deverell (borough engineer). An excellent lunch having been served, the toasts of “The Queen” and “The Acting Governor” were proposed from the chair, and enthusiastically pledged.
The Chairman then gave “The health of his Worship the Mayof of Adelaide”. In doing so he said that the capital value of property within the borough of South Brisbane was estimated at £4,000,000 and the annual value amounted to £200,000. The expenditure last year reached the sum of £57,250; the population was 25,000 and the number of children attending the State Schools was 1000. South Brisbane was, therefore, a place of considerable importance, and although it had only been a separate borough since January 1888, it had a record extending as far back as 1859, having, until little more than a year ago, formed part of the Municipality of Brisbane. Owing to the early colonists not having had the advantage of modern engineering skill in laying out the borough, the principal thoroughfare, Stanley-street, was a source of weary trouble to the council and a heavy expense to the ratepayers, but the more recently formed streets were well laid out and a credit to the borough (Applause). A question which was of great importance not only to the municipal bodies, but also to the Parliaments of the different colonies, was that of Australian federation. It was a question surrounded with very great difficulties, and he was afraid that the accomplishment of so desirable an object as the federation of the various colonies lay in the distant future. While our leading statesmen refused to entertain measures, no matter how beneficial they might be to the best interests of the people, simply because those proposals emanated from the brain of political opponents, or refused to take their seats at a Federal Council because the idea of having such a council did not come from themselves, Australian federation could not be brought about. Then, too there was the difficulty of adverse and hostile tariffs- free trade the fiscal policy of one colony, protection that of another: while one colony having limited territory, and another immense tracts of unsettled country, would require different land and emigration laws and so forth. The difficulties would have to be settled by the politicians, but what they, as the members of a municipal body, wished to do was to create and cement the best possible feeling between the citizens of the various colonies (Applause). On that account the corporation of South Brisbane had considered they were only doing what was right and proper in giving a hearty welcome to their worships the Mayors of Adelaide and Woollahra, and it afforded him very great pleasure to propose the health of the former gentlemen.
Mr Shaw, in responding to the toast, said that from what he had seen of the borough of South Brisbane within the past few days, he thought that the corporation had plenty of work to do, if they carried out the duties devolving upon them. He thanked the members of the council for the kindly hospitality which they had extended to him as the first mayor of Adelaide who had made a journey so far north. Having heard so much about the great progress which Brisbane was making in municipal and other matters, he considered he was only doing what was right as mayor of one of the southern capitals in taking advantage of the Easter holidays to visit the first city of Queensland; and he had been agreeably disappointed in beholding the wonderful strides which this city had made within a very few years. The architectural beauty and substantial character of the public buildings reflected great credit on those who have been connected with their construction. As regarded the hotel accommodation of the city, there was nothing to compare with it in any other city of the Southern hemisphere that he had visited (Applause) The railway communication between the different portions of the colony was, in his opinion, taking into consideration the youth of Queensland, much in advance of that of the older colonies. He quite agreed with the chairman that the time had not yet arrived when the colonies could be federated under the central Government, with representatives from each colony; but the first step towards federation had been made by the connection of the railway system between the different colonies, and the time had come when federation could, in a sense, be carried out by the mayors and aldermen of the capital and other cities of South Australia, Victoria , New South Wales, and Queensland interchanging visits with the object of gaining information from one another. (Applause) The time had come, in his opinion, when border duties should be abolished and there should be free trade throughout the whole of the colonies. He reiterated his views on the sanitary question and expressed by him last week, and strongly advocated the adoption of a deep drainage system of sewerage for Brisbane and South Brisbane, pointing out that at present time the people of Adelaide only paid one halfpenny in the pound more of a sanitary rate than did the people of the latter borough, and giving a warm invitation to the mayor and aldermen to visit Adelaide, when every information as to the carrying out and working of the drainage system of that city would be willingly supplied. He also made reference to the working of the Building Act in Adelaide, and advised the corporation to acquire all the land they could at reasonable rates for public reserve and within a chain of two of the river bank.
Mr Heaslop proposed the health of his worship the Mayor of Woollahra, to which Mr Neild replied. (The toasts continued.)
Brisbane Courier, Fri 21 Feb 1890 p2
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL ELECTION
No. 4 WARD
To PHILIP NOTT ESQ,
Sir,- We the undersigned Ratepayers of No. 4 Ward, request that you will allow yourself to be NOMINATED as an Alderman in the room of Alderman Midson, resigned, and we pledge ourselves to do all in our power to secure your return.
A.F. Luya George Turner
Thomas Lee M.B. Thomason
Ed. Deighton David Tait
Jas. Allen And 30 others
Gentlemen- I have much pleasure in acceding to your request, and, if elected for No. 4 Ward I shall do my very utmost to advance the interests of that Ward as well as that of the Borough generally.
I am, Gentlemen,
Your obedient servant,
PHILIP NOTT
Brisbane Courier, Mon 24 Feb 1890 p4
SOUTH BRISBANE NOMINATIONS
At the South Brisbane Municipal Council Chambers on Saturday, the returning-officer, Alderman A. Morry (Mayor), received the nominations of candidates for the seat on the council rendered vacant by the resignation of Alderman A. Midson.
The nominations of Messrs Philip Nott, Michael McDermott, and Dr James Booth were handed in and received, but that of Mr James Webb was declared informal on the ground that the 79th section of the Local Government Act had not been complied with.
Mr McDermott first addressed the ratepayers who were present, and said that his best endeavours, if returned, would be to make the present No 4 Ward the first ward in the municipality. He added that he was not Mr Stephen’s nominee, and was not acquainted with that gentleman, and this statement he hoped would be a satisfactory denial of certain rumours that had been circulated throughout the borough.
Mr Nott said he had been connected with municipal matters for some twelve or fifteen years, and did not consider it necessary at that time to express any of his views to the ratepayers. He had been accused of being a “Central Bridge man”, but it was a sufficient denial to state that he had moved the first motion in the present council for the duplication of the Victoria Bridge.
Dr Booth said that, if returned, he would devote his attention largely to the improvement of the sanitary conditions of the municipality which he thought were anything but creditable. He also considered that the Central Board of Health should have greater powers granted to it. He believed that to carry out the works needed the borough it would be necessary to go to the Parliament for an Enabling Act, and such a course would meet with his support if he were returned.
It was announced that the poll would tale place on 5th March, at the Municipal Council chambers.
Brisbane Courier, Sat 1 March 1890 p8
ELECTION NOTICE
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
ELECTION TO FILL EXTRAORDINARY VACANCY NO 4 WARD
I hereby announce that the following persons have been nominated as CANDIDATES to fill the Vacancy in the Council for No. 4 Ward caused by the resignation of Arthur Midson, Esq:-
JAMES BOOTH, Medical Practitioner, Cordelia-street
MICHARL COLMAN McDERMOTT, Gentleman, Ernest-street
PHILIP NOTT, Builder, Westbourne-street
The poll to be held on 4th March
Brisbane Courier, Wed 5 March 1890 p1
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
The election of a representative of No. 4 ward to fill the seat on the South Brisbane Municipal Council rendered vacant by the resignation of Alderman A. Midson took place yesterday. The candidates were Messrs Philip Nott, Michael McDermott, and Dr Booth, and the polling place the Mechanics’ Institute Stanley-street. The voting went on quietly during the day, and was without any notable incident. About a quarter to 6 o’clock the mayor (Alderman Morry) who acted as returning officer, announced at the polling place to about 50 persons who had assembled the result as follows: Mr Nott (elected), 350; Mr McDermott, 199; Dr Booth, 53; informal, 10. Mr Nott made a short speech, in the course of which he thanked those who had voted for the other candidates as well as those who had voted for himself. He did this because he liked to see the ratepayers taking an interest in municipal affairs. He would far rather a man would vote for any of the candidates than stay away from the election altogether. He would do all he could in the interests of the ward and for the borough at large, and he trusted when the time came when he would receive not only the support of his present friends, but the support also of those who had voted against him on this occasion. Mr McDermott, in returning thanks to his supporters, said that although he was defeated he looked upon it as a great victory that a comparative stranger to the district should poll almost 200 votes. He trusted on some future occasion when he was better known to the electors, that they would return him at the head of the poll. A vote of thanks was passed to the returning officer on the motion of Mr Nott, seconded by Mr McDermott. In responding, the Mayor said that he hoped all contests in the future would be carried on with the same good feeling which had characterized this one. The proceedings then terminated. Subsequently Mr Morry made the official declaration in the Town Hall and formally declared Mr Nott duly elected. Mr Nott, the successful candidate was a member of the South Brisbane Municipal Council until about thirteen months ago when, on the division of the borough into wards, he stood for the West End and was defeated.
Brisbane Courier, Fri 22 Jan 1892 p2
In the year 1891, there was great division within the Municipal Chamber and some enmity shown during meetings. It began with the election of mayor in February when the aldermen were evenly divided in their choice of mayor and a deadlock ensued. The rest of the year progressed with several disputes.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 9 Feb 1891 p5,6
SOUTH BRISBANE
The aldermen of South Brisbane met at the Council chamber at 11:30 am. On Saturday, and held a __ for the purpose of selecting one of their number to fill the mayoral chair for the ensuing year. This they did not, however, succeed in doing, and when an hour later they assembled in the public room it was clear that another “deadlock” had occurred. There were present: Aldermen Morry, Hardgrave, Blocksidge, Jones, Lose, Heaslop, Caswell, Stanton, Nott, Scanlan, Stephens and Francis.
The newly elected aldermen signed the usual declaration, took their seats at the council table, and the town clerk was voted to the chair for the purpose of conducting the election of mayor.
Mr Hardgrave said, as the oldest man in the company and as the eldest man in public life in the council, he took it upon himself to nominate a gentleman to fill the position of mayor for the enduing year. His choice was Mr Jones and he considered that it was a very good one. That gentleman was a representative of No. 4 Ward, and he was a man of intelligence, and one who, from his well-known integrity and ability, would elevate the position of mayor, rather than be elevated by it. Moreover the ward which he represented returned more rates and was of more importance than any other ward in the city. It was in existence before Woolloohgabba was though of or the Divisional Boards Act was in existence. It was a place of commercial importance for vessels came to its wharves years ago, when the bullock teams came round the Sydney-road and the One-mile Swamp. Yet it had never had one of its representatives in the chair, even in North Brisbane, when it was a part of the city.
Mr Blocksidge regretted that as on a previous occasion they were like a lot of schoolboys who could not agree among themselves, and they had to come to the council table and show the public their differences instead of agreeing and putting in a man unanimously. In proposing Mr Thomas Heaslop as mayor, he had nothing against Mr Jones, except that Mr Heaslop had had far longer experience, and was consequently better entitled to fill the chair. He held that the commercial interest of one ward did not qualify its representatives as against the representatives of the pother wards, and that in selecting a mayor it was the intelligence and experience of the candidate which they ought to look at. He was somewhat surprised, too, that Mr Nott had not been put forward as the candidate of No. 4 Ward, and was sorry to hear the reference made to the casting vote; but he could assure the council that they were not going to give a casting vote for Mr Jones. His reason for proposing Mr Heaslop was that that gentleman had lived on the South side since his boyhood, and his career had been an honourable one. He had well represented the ratepayers to this council and on the Woolloongabba Divisional Board, and there was an consensus of opinion amongst the outside public that he should be mayor this year.
(The arguments continued…, )
Mr Nott said the ratepayers of No. 4 Ward would be slighted if they were again passed over without having a representative in the chair. The idea of one ward being allowed to return the mayor this year of condition that another should have that privilege next year was one which he did not hold, as it was too much like making a bargain which could not with certainty be carried out. They were assembled to elect a mayor for that year, not for next.
A vote was then taken with the following result
For Mr Heaslop 5; For Mr Jones 5 (including Mr Nott). The meeting was adjourned.
Brisbane Courier, Fri 27 Feb 1891 p6
BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
ELECTION OF MAYOR
ELECTION OF MAYOR
A general meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council was held at noon yesterday for the purpose of considering a letter received from the Colonial Secretary in answer to a communication from the council in which the names of all the alderman were submitted owing to a difficulty in choosing a mayor for the current year. There were present- Messrs Hardgrave, Stanton, Blocksidge, Lise, Jones, Nott, Heaslop, Scanlan, Stephens, Francis and Morry. The following is a copy of the letter:-
I have the honour, by direction, to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 23rd instant, containing the particulars of the proceedings of your council at the several meetings held for the purpose of electing for the current year, and, with reference to the resolution passed at the meeting on the 23rd instant, to inform you that in the event of the mayor not being elected within the period prescribed by law, it is the intention of the Colonial Secretary to recommend to his Excellency the Administrator of the Government-in-Council to appoint Mr Thomas Heaslop.
The document having been read the council resumed.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 28 May 1891 p6
SOUTH BRISBANE COUNCIL MEETING
ELECTION OF MAYOR
The debate on the motion of Mr Jones that a letter be sent to the Colonial Secretary recommending that provision be made (when the Local Government Act of 1878 if further amended by Parliament) for the election of mayor by the ratepayers, was resumed by Mr Nott, who moved an amendment to the effect that, in the event of a deadlock, the election of mayor be made by the ratepayers. Mr Blocksidge suggested that the council should be allowed 14 days to consider the question in the event of a deadlock, and if they did not agree within that period, a poll of the ratepayers be taken. Messrs Nott and Jones accepted the amendment of Mr Blocksidge. While Mr Hardgrave was addressing the council a number of the aldermen rose and walked out, and the meeting lapsed for want of a quorum.
(NB At the meeting in June, after some discussion, both the motion and the amendment were lost.)
Brisbane Courier, Wed 19 Aug 1891 p3
PROPOSED STATION AT VULTURE STREET
DEPUTATION TO MR UNMACK
A deputation consisting of Messrs A.F. Luya and A. Morry, MM.L.A., Aldermen Heaslop (Mayor of South Brisbane), Stanton, Nott and Franceis, Messrs Lumley Hill, W. Chancellor, A Watt, J. Hislop, A. Midson, J. Hill (town clerk) and others, waited upon the Minister for Railways yesterday morning to ask that a railway station might be erected at the corner of Vulture and Grey Streets.
Mr Luya, in introducing the deputation, said one argument in favour of the erection of a station at that point was that it would be a fair compensation for the loss of the station at Dock-street, which would be removed. The proposed site was about the centre of South Brisbane, and it was close to the Police Court and Municipal Chambers, and he thought the people were entitled to a station there. In asking for this convenience they did not wish to deprive others of their privileges, but simply that the same facilities in the matter of railway accommodation that they at present enjoyed should be given. He pointed out that the Government had save about £30,0000 in connection with the Melbourne-street extension, and as the proposed station would only cost £500 he thought they were making a modest request.
Mr Heaslop said that he was chairman of a deputation who waited upon the Railway Commissioners some time ago with regard to the proposed station, and he certainly understood that their request would be granted. He had, however, received a letter from the commissioners a few days since stating that they could not build the station, as the traffic would not be sufficient to repay the cost of its erection. It appeared that the cost was really the obstacle in the way of the erection of the station. He pointed out that the station, if erected would be the most central station in South Brisbane, and the most convenient for people travelling from Kangaroo Point, Highgate Hill, West End, Coorparoo, as the stations at Gloucester-street and the gaol were very inconvenient to the general public. He also referred to the fact that Mr W. Stephens, M.L.A. had given sufficient land to make an entrance to the proposed station.
Mr Lumley Hill said it was absurd to say that it would cost £2000 to build a small station such as they required.
Mr Unmack said that the arguments adduced were all directed to the one point, whether there should or should not be a station at the corner of Vulture and Grey Streets. With regard to that matter he would tell them that they had come to the wrong man, as the Minister for Railways had nothing to do with the position of any railway station. According to the 26th section of the Railway Act the Railway Commissioners were constituted the authority to decide the position, character and suitableness of all railway stations, &c. But he would inform them that the commissioners were of opinion that ir would ultimately be of advantage to have a station at that point. With regard to the financial aspect of the question, he pointed out that it would cost £2000 to erect a suitable station at Vulture-street (Several voices “No, no.”) He accepted the estimate of the department and he said it was nonsense to say that a station could be built for £500. He would give them the particulars. The cost of the station would be £2000 and the working of the station would entail an expenditure of £500 per annum. The platform would cost £700, the building £700, gate signals for interlocking the stations £400, a foot bridge £100, and contingencies £100. Considering the financial position of the colony the Government were not justified in spending that sum of money. He thought the people of South Brisbane should let the lone get fairly open for traffic to see what they really required. All he could say was that the money was not on the Estmates this year for the construction of the station, although the commissioners had set it down on their list of works. The deputation would therefore have to wait 12 months.
The deputation expressed satisfaction in knowing that the commissioners were in favour of the erection of the station, and that the only reason why the work was not carried out was because there was no money on the Treasury. They thanked the Minister and withdrew.
The Queenslander, Sat 21 Feb 1891 p343
THE BAILIFFS IN THE SOUTH BRISBANE COUNCIL
Some two or three months ago Mr T. Harris while riding along the Ipswich-Road, was thrown from his horse and sustained damages to his person. The accident was attributed to negligence on the part of the South Brisbane Municipal Council and Mr Harris accordingly sued that body and claimed £7000 damages. The case was tried at some length in the Supreme Court, with the result that a verdict for £884, with costs, was returned for the plaintiff. The costs were exceedingly heavy, and the South Brisbane Council contemplated taking the matter before the Chief Justice, but ultimately decided to compromise, and accordingly did so just about the time that the annual elections were in progress. However, matters remained in abeyance until the 7th February, when the council were the recipients of a letter from Messrs Wilson and Newman-Wilson, demanding on behalf of their client the sum of £1,198 12s.8d., made up as follows: Verdict, £884; interest on same to date, £4 15s. 2d.; taxed costs, £854 17s 6d. At the time this demand was made the council was not legally constituted, there being no mayor, and in consequence of the deadlock no further notice was taken of the peremptory notice to pay up.
On Thursday morning, however, the town clerk was considerably surprised to receive a visit from Mr Hallway, under sheriff, who had ion his hand a writ of execution authorizing him to seize any property or chattels belonging to the South Brisbane Council. Mr Hill could do nothing more than glare at Mr Gallway and request him to take a seat. Mr Morry, the ex-mayor, and Alderman Jones were present in the council chambers, but neither of these gentlemen was prepared to clear the council from its embarrassment. Accordingly Mr Gallway promptly placed his man in charge, and the bailiff with a sorrowful smile sat down in an easy chair and meditatively studied the Local Government Act. Had the demand on behalf of Mr Harris been made prior to the annual elections, it is asserted that the claim would have been settled without any bother, but at the present time the council is not legally constituted, and cannot pass the amount claimed. There must be added to the amount set forth on the face of the writ a sum of £80 for stamp duty. An urgent meeting was held at 4 o’clock in the afternoon, at which Aldermen Morry (the Mayor), Heaslop, Nott, Jones, Stanton, Lose, Scanlan, and Blocksidge were present.
After Alderman Nott had made several objections to an increase in rates by the Council, in particular for Ward No. 4, the ratepayers themselves called a public meeting:
Brisbane Courier, Tues 30 June 1891 p6
THE QUESTION OF RATING
MEETING OF SOUTH BRISBANE RATEPAYERS
A meeting of ratepayers of South Brisbane was held at the Old Mechanics’ Institute in Stanley-street last evening, to consider the matter of the rating as fixed by the Municipal Council. Mr Steel occupied the chair, and there was a large attendance, many persons being unable to obtain sitting accommodation.
The Chairman said it was necessary that they should meet that night to protest against the excessive rate which council had struck especially for No. 4 Ward. (Hear, hear.) As ratepayers they had a right to know why such a heavy rate had been struck, and how their money was being spent. It was reported in town that there was not enough work for a great number of the council’s officers, but they were kept on because the council did not like to dismiss them (Applause) W air right that the ratepayers should support these officers? (Several voices: “No, no.”) He thought the rates had been struck in a very erratic manner (Hear,hear.) etc. There must be something wrong there, and the meeting should do all in the power to get it made right (Hear, hear.)
Mr Luya, M.L.A. read letters of apology from Aldermen Jones and Nott and Mr Parr Smith regretting their inability to be present. He explained that he had called the meeting at the request of a number of ratepayers, and it would be for them to take what action they sought fit with regard to the rating. If they thought the rates fixed by the council were too high then they should appoint a committee to wait upon the mayor, as was done in the city, with a view of getting the taxation reduced. (Hear, hear.) For his own part, and from what he could gather from others, he considered the valuations had been arrived at by rule of thumb; for he could not conceive of any sane body of men taxing the people as the aldermen of that borough had done the residents of South Brisbane. (Hear, hear.) The council seemed to have forgotten altogether that property had depreciated in value during the last year or two. The value of property was no more than it would bring in the market; but the aldermen had evidently not considered this; nor had they considered the fact- namely, that rents had gone down from 25 to 50 % while numbers of houses were untenanted. (Applause) The citizens were all reducing expenditure and trying to economize, and the council should do the same. (Hear, Hear.) The council had been spoiled by having too much money to spend- (Hear, hear)- and the facilities for borrowing had been too great. It was no use for the council to try and get blood out of a stone, for as a matter of fact he did not think there was a business in South Brisbane which was paying. Messrs Jones and Nott, the representatives of No. 4 Ward, deserved the thanks of the ratepayers for the stand they took at a recent meeting of the council in resisting the unfair taxation which the other aldermen wished to impose on the people of the ward. (Applause.) He believed that 1d. in the pound was quite sufficient for the requirements of No. 4 Ward for the next 12 months. (Hear, hear)
Mr A. Steel said that he did not as a rule find fault with their representatives either political or municipal, but he thought that with the exception of Aldermen Nott and Jones, the council had altogether mistaken their functions. (Hear, hear.) The aldermen were elected to carry on the work of the municipality in the best interests of the ratepayers, but the present council seemed to think that they were elected for the purpose of extracting as much money from the ratepayers they possibly could, and to spend it in a manner which, to say the least of it, was not wise. (Applause) He might refer to one instance of this- the building of the new Town Hall (Applause) In the purchase of the piece of land on which the building was being erected, the ratepayers had been wrongly deprived of their hard-earned money which ought to have gone to the improvements of the streets. (Hear, hear.) So far as the rating was concerned, he had worked the matter out, as it affected his own property, and he found that his taxes were 33% higher this year than last year. This was, he considered, very unfair in such bad times, and he hoped a committee would be appointed to wait on the council to see if they would not reduce the rate. (Applause)
Mr McDermott agreed with Mr Luya that the thanks of the people of No. 4 Ward were due to Messrs Nott and Jones for the efforts made by them in the council to keep the rates in their ward down. (Hear, hear.)
(The meeting continued.)
Votes of thanks were accorded to Aldermen Jones and Nott and the chairman, after which the meeting terminated, the committee remaining behind to make arrangements for the deputation to the council.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 9 July 1891 p2
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
SOUTH BRISBANE VALUATIONS
Sir,
In your report of the proceedings in the interview of a deputation appointed from a public meeting with the mayor and council of South Brisbane in reference to the above, the following remarks by the mayor are given:-
“There were two gentlemen who were not present with the deputation who had good reason to complain, and they were Messrs Collings and Ramsay.” Now, as this implies on the part of his worship a misapprehension of the import of remarks made by myself at the meeting from which the deputation was appointed, I beg leave to state that I was very particular in saying that I had no cause for complaint. Nor should I have said anything on the point I did but for the fact that in answer to a direct question a few days before the meeting- put to one of the South Brisbane aldermen- I was definitely assured that whatever rate was made under the new Act would include the sanitary rate, Finding afterwards from what took place at the council meeting that, besides a rate for general purposes of 1 ½d. in the pound, a sanitary rate of £15s. for each service was struck. I saw that I had been either wrongly informed by the aforesaid alderman, or that the amount proposed to be levied would come- in the case of small property- to more than the maximum allowed by the new Act. I endeavoured to put before the meeting the position as it appeared to me, because I thought there was a mistake somewhere. And though I called attention to the fact that the proposed levy for sanitary purposes would amount to more than 2d. in the pound on the council’s assessment of the property on which I reside it was not for the purpose of complaining. Because I recognize this, that even if the proposed sanitary rate amounted to 4d. in the pound on small property- it being for direct service- there can be no cause for complaint if it cannot be done for less and every service is charged the same. And I cannot recognize the validity or principle of the remarks made by Alderman Nott at the council meeting when the rates were struck. Indeed if correctly reported I think that gentleman failed to comprehend principles when he stated that “people should be made to pay according to their ability to pay, and the rate for his purpose should be in proportion to the property rated.” My humble opinion is that persons should in rating- as in all other matters- pay for what they get and not on what they have got. Surely the fact that one person’s income is double that of another is no justification for charging him double for the same article, or service. And as in the matter under notice the service rendered- that is attention to each closet- is equal whether the closet is on a sixteen-perch allotment or on a two-acre one, whether it serves for a four-roomed house or a fourteen-roomed one, indeed it would be quite possible to conceive that the amount of work required to be done in the latter case would be less than in the former, because in many small houses, more persons may be found living than in some larger ones. Of course taxation of any kind is for the payer never a subject for jubilation; no one wants to be made to feel that he lives to be taxed, and consequently we like to be let down as lightly as possible. Nevertheless we cannot avoid some, and should never object to what is just; and I think it right that it should not be taken for granted that Alderman Nott was voicing the opinion of all when giving his own.
I am, Sir,
J.Collings
The following discussion by the council members about the building shows there was some dissent about the construction and cost of the building of the Municipal Chambers in 1891/92.
Brisbane Courier, Wed 4 March 1891 p6
SOUTH BRISBANE COUNCIL MEETING
The first ordinary meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council after the election of the mayor was held yesterday afternoon…
Appointment of Committees
The council then proceeded to the appointment of the standing committees for the year. The elections resulted as follow:
Finance Committee: Messrs Stephens, Hardgrave, Jones, Nott, Stanton and Blocksidge
Legislative Committee: Messrs Stephens, Jones, Morry, Lose, and Hardgrave
Health Committee: The council as a whole
General Purposes Committee: The chairman of all the other committees
Park Committee: Messrs Heaslop, Hardgrave, Blocksidge, Stanton, Nott and Scanlan.
Building Committee: Messrs Morry, Blocksidge, Nott and Stephens.
Brisbane Courier, 29 Dec 1891 p5
SOUTH BRISBANE COUNCIL MEETING
The Municipal Building
A letter was received from Messrs Hall and Son, architects, forwarding for the council’s inspection copies of drawings of entrance steps and gates for the new municipal chambers. The work was estimated to cost £780. Mr Stephens moved that the letter be referred to the Building Committee, with power to act. Mr Hardgrave objected to the committee dealing with such a large sum of money. Mr Jones said he thought something might be done for less money than as stated. In the present state of the council’s finances it would be utterly unwise to spend so large a sum. The architect should have included the expenditure proposed in his estimate. The Mayor said possibly a 4 in. brick wall would do, but at all events something was needed to finish the building off. Mr Blocksidge said it was a fact that the building would be finished before anyone could get up or down without the use of a long ladder. The Mayor said he thought something respectable should be put up. Mr Morry defended the architect, stating that he had received no instructions in the matter at first, and when he was asked to prepare plans for the approaches he did so in conformity with the character of the building. Mr Francis said the council should not spoil the building for the sake of a few pounds. Having spent so many thousands on it they should finish if off in a proper manner. Mr Jones again said he was surprised at the plan being placed before the council. The cost of the fence should have been included in the original price, and such not being the case, the fault rested with the Building Committee and everyone connected with it. It had been a bungle throughout. Mr Stehens: Tell us something new. Mr Jones: And not the committee are thoroughly ashamed of their work. Mr Morry: You said the building would cost £30,000 the other day. Mr Jones: I have said before that the building is an abortion, and I repeat it now. It is in the wrong place, and there is nothing right about it. Mr Blocksidge: It is so bad that you will never sit in it. (Laughter.) Mr Jones said the council might feel inclined to spend the money, but he did not, and neither did the ratepayers. He would not hesitate to raise his voice against it. Mr Morry: You should have done so at the proper time. Mr Jones said he did so, but he was outvoted. He deprecated the spending of so many hundreds of pounds at present, particularly by the Building Committee. The Mayor said it was understood that the tenders would come before the council. Mr Nott said the gentlemen who criticized the Building Committee ought to suggest a better fence than that proposed. It was absolutely necessary to do something to protect the building from the larrikins. Mr Jones said this was the first time the minority had been allowed to have anything to say on the matter. Mr Stephens: You were asked to go on the committee. Mr Jones said it was unbecoming to ask the opponents to the building to suggest something now. Mr Morry said an alderman who called the building an abortion could hardly be expected to make a suggestion worthy of notice. He held a very different opinion of the building to what Mr Jones did, and he thought he was quite as competent to judge. Mr Jones was about to reply when Mr Blocksidge rose to a point of order, and the mayor ruled Mr Jones out of order. The motion was then carried, Mr Jones and Hardgrave voting against it and the mayor remarking that the matter was not worthy the discussion which had been given it.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 23 Dec 1901 p9
NEW BANDSTAND IN MUSGRAVE PARK
OPENING CEREMONIES
The opening of the bandstand in the Musgrave Park took place on Saturday before a very fair crowd if south side residents. A musical programme if seven pieces, in three of which four massed bands, consisting of sixty performers from the Headquarters, Police, Volunteer Rifles, and Q.R.R.A.A. bands, played, was gone through in very excellent style. Each band separately played one piece under its own conductor, but Mr Larsen wielded the baton in the united performances. Among those present were his worship the Mayor of South Brisbane and Mrs Stephens; the three trustees of the Park, Alderman P. Nott, Rev. D. Mitchell and Mr F. O’Dwyer; Alderman Garsden, Alderman Schofield, Mr Hill (town clerk), Mr Paget, M.L.A. Mr Myline, and others. Alderman Nott, in a short speech, requested the Mayor to formally open the bandstand, and Mr Hill gave a brief history of the movement for erecting the stand, stating among other facts that the cost had only been £190. Mayor Stephens then declared the stand open and the programme as arranged was carried out. The day was a trifle warm, but the music was nevertheless enjoyable, and a fair number of seats had been provided.
It may be added that the movement to secure the bandstand was initiated by the late Mr A.F. Luya who on 9th February 1899 called a meeting at which the desirableness of building such a structure was affirmed. The movement remained undeveloped for some time, on account of the death of Mr Luya, the next meeting being held on 18th May 1900 about which time the Government were approached again; but the project still hung fire, until the Municipal Council, urged by Alderman Fish, pushed it ahead. Up to Saturday £41 of the total was still unprovided. The trustees have suggested the establishment of a fund, so that music may be provided each week end, and also the various speakers on Saturday impressed upon the audience that the bandstand was the property of the people, and that it was in their interests to protect it.
Municipality of South Brisbane Annual Election
Nominations of Candidates to fill the Vacancies on the Council caused by the retirement (as provided for by the provisions of the Local Government Act of 1876) of the following Aldermen-
Arthur Morry No 1 Ward
W. Stephens No 2 Ward
Michael McKenna No 3 Ward
Philip Nott No 4 Ward
Etc
Brisbane Courier, Sat 23 Jan 1892 p2
SOUTH BRISBANE ELECTION
TO THE RATEPAYERS OF No. 1 WARD
Ladies and Gentlemen- Through a mistake on the Municipal Office the rates due on one of my allotments were unpaid on the 1st of November, and although my name appears on the Roll, there appears to be some doubt as to whether I could legally sit if elected. Under the circumstances, in the interests of the Ward and to avoid the risk of litigation, I am advised to RETIRE.
Thanking you for your very large offers of support, and with an assurance that my service will be available at any time,
I remain,
Your obedient servant
PHILIP NOTT
South Brisbane 22nd January 1892
Brisbane Courier, Wed 27 January 1892 p2
MR P. NOTT”S RETIREMENT
Sir- I see by your report of the proceedings of the South Brisbane Council that Alderman Stephens was kind enough to give a reason for my retirement from the contest for No. 1. Ward- namely, that I was afraid of an opponent. I have already given my reasons through the Press, and am satisfied the ratepayers generally accept them as true,- I am, sir, &c.
PHILIP NOTT
Brisbane Courier, Wed 14 Dec 1892 p5
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The fortnightly meeting of the Sth Brisbane Municipal Council was held last evening. (NB. P. Nott no longer an alderman)
Correspondence….
From the manager of the Union Bank, stating that Mr P. Nott had been appointed to report on the state of the Bowen Hotel. The Mayor stated that some mortgagees of buildings and property kept them in the names of the original owners, and held the mortgage so that the council were unable to recover the rates. In the case under consideration the council were, however, likely not only to get their rates, but to have the building repaired, as they had threatened to take further action if the building was not renovated.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 9 Jan 1893 p4
On Saturday Philip Nott, builder, was elected unopposed for No. 1. Ward, South Brisbane.
Brisbane Courier, Tues 19 January 1893 p5
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The fortnightly meeting of the South Brisbane Council was held yesterday evening. Alderman Heaslop (mayor) etc.
Recent Vacancies
The Mayor announced the return of Mr A. Luya to fill the vacancy at the council table in the representation of No. 2 Ward caused by the death of the late Mr Scanlan, and also the election of Mr P. Nott to fill the vacancy caused by the disqualification of Mr Stanton as an alderman for No. 1 Ward. He said that Mr Nott could not be present, having made arrangements to go to Bundaberg previous to his election. He welcomed Mr Luya to he council.
Brisbane Courier, Sat 27 May 1893 p6
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
FINANCIAL POSITION
WORKMEN DISCHARGE, OFFICERS GRANTED LEAVE
A special meeting of the South Brisbane Council was held at the South Brisbane Municipal Chambers yesterday morning. There were present- His worship the Mayor (Aldreman T. Heaslop), J. Franceis, G. Blockridge, W. Stephens, M. McKenna, W. Jones, J. Overchal(?), P. Nott and J, Allan.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
A progress report of a special meeting of the Finance Committee held on Wednesday 17th instant, for the purpose of considering the financial position of the council consequent upon the suspension of the Queensland National Bank, was read. It was recommended that the mayor and Aldermen Jones and Nott should interview the managers of the Union Bank of Australia, the Bank of New South Wales and the Bank of Australasia; also if necessary the Colonial Treasurer or other monetary institutions, with a view of obtaining temporary financial assistance to enable the council to tide over the present difficulty. It was also resolved:- “That the whole of the workmen in the council’s employment be discharged that evening and their wages paid as soon as the council could obtain funds; that the whole of the officers in the engineer’s department be granted a holiday without pay, from the date of the meeting until such time as the council were in a position to re-employ them; that the officers in the town clerk’s department be retained with a view of getting out the valuations and rate notices, and that they be notified that their salaries will not be paid until such time as the council were in receipt of their rates; that the salaries due up to date to the engineer’s staff be paid as soon as funds were available; that the South Brisbane Gas Company be informed that, owing to the financial difficulty in which the council was placed by the suspension of the Queensland National Bank, it had been decided to notify them to discontinue the lighting of all streets, thoroughfares, and public places within the municipality after the date of meeting.”
If the directors should deem it necessary that further information should be given they would be invited to meet his worship the Mayor and any members of the committee, who would explain the council’s position.
The Mayor stated that the Eureka Sanitary Company had stated that they could not wait for their money, as it was principally for the payment of wages. The mayor also stated that he had waited upon the managers of the Union Bank and the Bank of New South Wales but they could not assist the council.
On the motion of Mr Stephens, seconded by Mr Jones, it was resolved to go into Committee of the Whole to consider the financial position.
On resuming, it was reported that the committee had appointed a deputation, consisting of Messrs Stephens, Jones and the mayor, to wait upon the Government concerning the question of finances and properties of the borough.
Brisbane Courier, Fri 26 Jan 1894 p2
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS
SOUTH BRISBANE NOMINATIONS
The following nominations were received for the vacancies on the South Brisbane Municiap Council
Subdivision No. 1: Philip Nott, builder and contractor; nominated by H. Baynes, R. Bulcock, J. Hardgrave and others. Etc.
The Queenslander, Sat 10 Feb 1894 p248- ELECTIONS
South Brisbane Municipality
No 1 Ward
West End School of Arts
Philip Nott 118; Richard J. Kelly 93
Grand Arcade
Philip Nott 133; Richard J Kelly 51
Total: Philip Nott 252; Richard J. Kelly 144
Majority for Nott 108
Brisbane Courier, Fri 24 January 1896 p2
SUMMARY OF ATTENDANCE OF ALDERMEN FOR 1895
Meetings Held: Regular 24; Special 9; Finance 28; Others 53; Total 114
Philip Nott Ward 1 Elected Feb 1895; Retires Feb 1898; Regular 22; Special 9; Finance 16; Others 15; Total 62
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 30 January 1896 p4
SOUTH BRISBANE COUNCIL
A special meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council was held at noon yesterday for the election of Mayor for the ensuing year. On the motion of Mr Dibley, seconded by Mr Burke, Mr A. Luya was elected, his candidature being also supported by Messrs Stephens, Sinclair and Midson. Mr Nott was first proposed by the retiring Mayor, Mr Jones, seconded by Mr Duncan, but on his name being submitted, five only voted for him and seven against. Mr Luya’s nomination was then put, and carried unanimously. Mr Luya addressed the council at some length on matters affecting the welfare of the borough, and thanked the aldermen for the honour done him.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 11 Jan 1897 p1
MUNICIPALITY OF SOUTH BRISBANE
Summary of attendance of Aldermen for the Year 1896
Meetings held- Regular and Special 35; Finance 29’ Works and Others 91; Total 85
A Luya, Mayor
Philip Nott. Ward No 1; Regular and Special 28, Finance 1, Works and Others 18; Total 47
Brisbane Courier, Tues 30 March 1897 p6
Wood Paving on the Bridge
Mr Stephens moved: “That a deputation wait on the Bridge Board, asking that the decking of the new half of the bridge be laid in asphalt, or some material other than wood.”. Mr Burke seconded the motion. Mr Nott urged that to oppose wood paving was a retrograde step. He thought that, with timber as hard as Queensland timber was, the wider joint system of paving was preferable, and would be less dangerous. He also favoured the coating of the wood pavement with tar and sand. Mr Midson expressed the opinion that wood pavement was the best form of roadway that could be devised. Mr Dibley thought a mistake had been made in laying down ironbark blocks; spotted-gum and blackbutt, he thought, would be an improvement. Mr Fish suggested that they should ask the Bridge Board to lay over the whole of the wood pavement a coating of sand and tar. The Mayor said he had drawn Mr Brady’s attention to other timber that would be better than ironbark for road-making purposes. He had advocated timbers which might not be so dense in texture or so greasy as ironbark, but which, nevertheless, would be durable. Eventually the Mayor, Messrs Sinclair, Stephens and Nott were appointed a deputation to represent the matter to the Bridge Board.
NB. the following year, Philip Nott was on the Victoria Bridge Board.
Brisbane Courier, Tues 14 Feb 1899 p6 (ELECTION AS MAYOR)
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
CONTINUATION OF THE DEADLOCK
ADJOURNMENT TILL WEDNESDAY
The adjourned special meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council, called for the purpose of electing a Mayor, was held yesterday afternoon. The chair was occupied by the town clerk (Mr J.Hill) and there were also present-Aldermen Luya, Nott, Stephens, McDougall, Garsden, Duncan, Davies, Phillips, Dibley, Foley, Jones and Fish. Ex-Alderman Hardgrave occupied a seat near the chairman.
On the proceedings having been opened, Alderman Stephens suggested that a fresh show of hands should be taken on the amendment on Saturday that Alderman Dibley should be Mayor.
Alderman Fish thought that probably they might arrive at some compromise in the matter, by the gentlemen who had obtained the same number of votes agreeing to retire from the contest. It would then be open to the aldermen to propose someone else. If that were done it would be very hard if they did not settle the whole matter in ten minutes. To continue the fight on the same lines as on Saturday would be suicidal, and it certainly would not exalt the council in the eyes of the public. Before they proceeded with the business he hoped that either aldermen would offer suggestions.
Alderman Stephens said he would like to see first whether the adjournment had affected the result at all.
The Town Clerk said he did not think the adjournment had altered the position. Practically they had the same council.
Alderman Stephens urged that they might take a show of hands, and if that showed they were in the same position they could then talk about a compromise.
The Town Clerk said that if that were the feeling of the aldermen he would take a vote, and he then proceeded to state the effect of the amendment.
Alderman Phillips said that before that was put he would like to see whether some compromise could not be effected. He could not too severely deprecate these deadlocks and these unseemly meetings, which took place year by year. They had not been so noted for these occurrences as the north side, and he hoped they would not be. If there could be no compromise he would more than likely alter his hand.
An Alderman: What are you going to do?
Alderman Phillips: I will tell you afterwards.
The Town Clerk then put the amendment with the result that Alderman Nott, Garsden, Fish and Joyce voted for it, and Alderman Phillips., Duncan, Davies McDougall, Foley and Stephens against it. He accordingly declared the amendment lost.
Alderman Fish said he was sorry that the vote had been taken. He felt now that they ought to try and elect a man who had occupied the position before, and who was thoroughly conversant with its duties. He would have preferred that an alderman should have been chosen who had not occupied the position before, but as it appeared that that could not be done, he would propose that an ex-mayor should be elected. He moved that Alderman Jones, who had already occupied the position, and who was fully qualified to do so again should be elected.
Aldemran Dibley formally seconded the proposal, which now stood as an amendment to the original motion in favour of Alderman Luya the retiring Mayor.
Alderman Foley said he thought that Alderman Jones should be the Mayor, but since Saturday a great number of the ratepayers of No $. Ward had called upon him and asked him to vote for Alderman Luya. In deference to their wishes he had decided to vote for the latter.
Alderman Dibley said he was glad that this contest had taken place because he believed that the proceedings there and at another place would lead to the election of the Mayor being placed in the hands of the ratepayers. When he was first elected to the council he tabled a motion to the effect that the time had arrived when the Local Government Act should be so amended that the Mayor should be elected by the ratepayers. The necessity for that had been simply shown. He intended to vote for Alderman Jones, but he would have given his vote for Alderman Nott if there had been any chance of his winning the election.
Alderman Stephens said he had always opposed the election of the Mayor by the ratepayers, because it would give a rich man a better chance of winning the position than a poor man. A rich man, who spent money, would always have the advantage, and he was opposed to giving money any undue influence.
Alderman Jones said that though his name had been mentioned, he would infinitely prefer that a new man should be elected. He was determined, however, to resist the re-election of Alderman Luya, and that was why he would submit himself to a vote, even if only one voted for him. If Alderman Luya was re-elected for the fourth time it would be a disgrace to every man who sat at the council table.
Alderman Stephens rose to a point of order. Had Alderman Jones the right to say that any action taken by the aldermen was a disgrace?
Alderman Jones withdrew the expression, repeating that he would prefer to see a new man elected.
Alderman Phillips stated that he would vote for Alderman Luya.
Alderman Garsden said that his impression had been from the first that Alderman Nott ought to be put in the chair. There was no man for whom he had a greater respect and admiration than for the late Mayor, but he thought it would be very unjust and very unfair to the remainder of the aldermen if he were elected for a fourth term. It was the just and laudable ambition of every alderman in time to occupy that position, but if this sort of thing were going to prevail it would render it impossible for other members to achieve the position. He was very sorry that Alderman Luya had not refused to allow himself to be nominated this time. He thought Alderman Jones would make an excellent Mayor, but he considered they ought to choose one of the eligible aldermen- Aldermen Nott, Alderman Fish or Alderman Dibley.
Alderman McDougall said the same ratepayers had elected him as had elected Alderman Luya and Alderman Stephens and he considered it was his duty to his colleagues to vote for Alderman Luya.
The Town Clerk put the amendment in favour of Alderman Jones, with the result that Aldermen Nott, Garsden, Dibley and Fish (4) voted for it, and Aldermen Stephens, Duncan, McDougall, Davies and Foley (5) against it.
Alderman Garsden again nominated Alderman Nott.
Alderman Stephens asked that the proposal of Alderman Luya should also be put again.
Alderman Davies said that as he was rather new and unaccustomed to their procedure, perhaps he had used words unbecoming with reference to his colleague Alderman Nott on Saturday. Those remarks, he should say, referred to other quarters than those to which they had been applied by the reporters. Mr Nott was a man in whom he had the greatest confidence—he was a man of irreproachable and unimpeachable character—and would really make a very good Mayor. His reason for not voting for Alderman Nott on Saturday was that he did not think Alderman Nott had moved sufficiently with the times. From Various explanations which he had heard since, he had learned that, owing to the delicate financial condition of the council and other extenuating circumstances, Alderman Nott was not perhaps so much to blame, and he (Alderman Davies) was inclined to withdraw the statement that he had made. He had now pleasure in seconding Mr Garsden’s motion in favour of his colleague.
Alderman Jones spoke in support of Alderman Nott’s nomination. If he were Alderman Luya, he would retire. No one should ever say that he (Alderman Jones) occupied the chair too long. He believed the great majority of the people would say that Alderman Luya had been Mayor long enough, and that it was high time that another Mayor was elected.
On the motion being put, there was an equal number for and against Alderman’s nomination. Alderman Garsden, Dibley, Fish, Jones and Davies voted for, and Alderman Stephens, McDougall, Phillips, Foley and Duncan against Alderman Nott.
After some further discussion, the meeting was then adjourned until 2:30 o’clock to-morrow (Wednesday) afternoon. Before separating the aldermen authorized the chairman of the Finance Committee and the ex-Mayor to pay the corporations wages.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 16 Feb 1899 p7
SOUTH BRISBANE MAYORALTY
DEADLOCK REMOVED
ALDERMAN NOTT ELECTED MAYOR
The adjourned meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council for the purpose of electing a mayor was held yesterday afternoon. The town clerk presided over a full attendance of aldermen. There was a motion before the council that Alderman Luya be Mayor, and on this an amendment that Alderman Nott be elected. On the amendment, when put, the voting was equal.
Alderman Fish said there was only one way of electing a mayor, and that was for Alderman Luya to withdraw. This would allow of another being nominated. Personally, he had no particular desire to occupy the position of mayor, and if he was the stumbling block he was willing to withdraw his name. He had been approached by more ratepayers on this subject than ever before, and no one disapproved of his action. If Alderman Luya was elected unanimously there would be some justification for him to take the chair. Therefore, he was not doing himself any good, and was disgracing the municipality by continuing his candidature.
Alderman Jones appealed to Alderman Luya to retire, as he said he was u=injuring himself in seeking to be elected for the fourth time. He was willing to vote for any man at the table except Alderman Luya, because he considered that gentleman was unreasonable.
Alderman Luya said he had not sought the position. He had been nominated by a number of friends and they insisted on him keeping to his place. Quite a number of ratepayers also had asked him to retain the chair. The way would have been cleared materially if it had not been for the offensive language previously used by Alderman Fish. It was not good taste for any alderman nominated for the chair to stand up and speak, so he could not defend himself. Without the consent of his supporters he would not retire.
As no decision was arrived at, it was decided on the motion of Alderman Stephens to adjourn for a quarter of an hour. On reassembling the amendment was again put, the voting being still 5 to 5.
Alderman Luya said during the adjournment he had had an opportunity of consulting with the gentlemen who had so loyally supported him. He had intimated before that he did not feel justified in withdrawing without their consent. One of the matters that claimed their attention was the declaration of Alderman Jones that he would support any other alderman. This had some weight with his (Alderman Luya’s) supporters, and reluctantly they gave way and agreed that he should have his own way. The public might think that the position of mayor in South Brisbane was not altogether honorary, but also that there was some pecuniary profit. He was glad of the opportunity of saying that all the time he had been Mayor it had meant a heavy pecuniary loss. It must not be imagined that the aspirants to the office were actuated by mercenary motives. Bearing these matters in mind, and not being willing to take the position without a large vote of the council, with the consent of his supporters, he would withdraw, (Applause) but he was prepared to make another nomination.
The motion having been withdrawn, and the amendment become the substantive motion. Alderman Luya moved that Alderman Stephens be Mayor. He pointed out that he was one of the oldest aldermen, and he also claimed Alderman Jones’s vote in terms of his declaration.
Alderman Duncan seconded the motion.
Alderman Fish quoted from the newspaper reports to show that he had not used offensive language to Alderman Luya.
Alderman Jones said when he spoke previously he was thinking of young aldermen. Alderman Nott was before them. Let him be disposed of, and he would do what he had said. He had done nothing to make him withdraw his support; dispose of him and he would vote for Alderman Stephens or anyone else. He had said “any alderman”; but he ought to have said a “new member’.
Alderman Stephens said he had frequently told friends he would not take the mayoral chair, as his other numerous positions took up too much of his time. But there was a deadlock, and to get over the difficulty he had said he would accept it.
Alderman Dibley said there were other ways of getting out of the difficulty. Alderman Stephen’s ward had already had the chair for about ten years.
Alderman Phillips said he came to prevent further deadlock. Not only were they damaging themselves before their constituents; but they were acting like a lot of schoolboys. For the welfare of the council and the sake of unanimity he was going to prevent further deadlock, though he had partly given a promise to support Alderman Stephens if there was a chance of electing him.
The nominations of Alderman Stephens was lost by 4 to 6, the vote being: For: Aldermen Luya, Foley, Duncan and McDougall. Against: Aldermen Davies, Phillips, Fish, Dibley, Jones and Garsden.
Alderman McDougall wished to nominate Alderman Jones. But the latter declined to allow it to go on. Alderman Foley proposed Alderman Duncan but the latter stated he would refuse to accept the position, and in turn against proposed Alderman Luya. That gentleman said he had made up his mind not to take the position. Alderman Nott’s nomination was then carried, Alderman Duncan alone dissenting. The new Mayor was escorted to the chair.
Alderman Jones congratulated Alderman Nott on his election, and said he thought the result would prove a deathblow to repeated mayoral re-elections. He considered the position should go round.
Alderman Luya congratulated him also. The occupation of the chair, he said, entailed a large amount of work; but there was compensation in the enlarging and broadening of the mind of the occupant. A to the circumstances of the election, he hoped the friction would be forgotten.
The other aldermen also spoke. Alderman Duncan said: “As I cannot lay the paint on as thick as my brother-aldermen, I will hold my tongue.”
The Mayor returned thanks. He said he believed he had received a high honour. He would conduct himself in the chair as he believed he had done in his capacity as an alderman for a long time. (Applause) He daresay he had made mistakes, but he had made them in a sincere desire to do right. That was the way he would act during his occupancy of the chair. He was not a genius: but he trusted he had sufficient discretion to conduct the business of the council with the assistance of the aldermen (Applause) He was glad the extreme step of appointment by the Government had not to be resorted to, and said he had not asked any alderman for his vote or invoked assistance to secure support. He was sure there would be no animus in the future now that the matter had been settled. He had considerable experience in municipal work, and he hoped to apply it without favouring any particular ward. (Applause)
The aldermen, with ex-Aldermen Clark and Forrester, who had occupied seats behind the mayoral chair, then retired to the Mayor’s room, where the Mayor proposed the health of the retiring Mayor. Alderman Luya, in reply, proposed the health of the town clerk in a eulogistic speech. The health of the ex-aldermen was also drunk.
Brisbane Courier, Sat 24 June 1899 p11
BLIND and DEAF and DUMB INSTITUTION
The annual breaking-up entertainment of the Blind and Deaf and Dumb Institution was held yesterday afternoon at he Institution, in the presence of a very large gathering, amongst whom were- the Mayor of South Brisbane (Mr P. Nott), the Hon, F. Foxton (Home Secretary), Mesdames Pinnock, etc. etc.
The programme consisted of reading in braille type, recitations, songs and illustrations of writing on the Brialle frames, also typewriting by the blind pupils. The deaf and dumb pupils’ exercises consisted of reading from ordinary lesson-books by the senior pupils, who are being taught articulation…. The blind music pupils played a piano duet and one violin duet in very good style. The prizes were presented by his worship the Mayor of South Brisbane, who said it was a great pleasure, though in some respects sad, to be present at their entertainment. The benefits of such an institution to those afflicted could not be too highly recommended.
The visitors inspected the workshops and home.
Brisbane Courier, Wed 9 Aug 1899 p10 (DISCUSSION OF THE UPCOMING FEDERATION BILL)
GATHERING AT WEST END
SPEECHES BY MESSRS STEPHENS AND LESINA, MM.L.A.
A meeting called in opposition to the adoption by Queensland of the Federal Convention Bill was held on Monday evening at the West End School of Arts, Brisbane and was largely attended by anti-federalists.
Mr P. Nott, Mayor of South Brisbane was in the chair. The principal speakers during the evening were Messrs W. Stephens and V. Lesina MM.L.A. who were both accorded a very patient hearing, and their utterances much applauded.
The Chairman in opening the meeting said he considered it only right that their representatives should give them their views on this great question. He had heard it discussed many times and it had always seemed to him that men were considered rather than principles. It was the latter they should rather hear about and he was sure they could all do with more light on the federation question from both points of view.
Mr W. Stephens M.L.A. then delivered an address on the subject. He observed that the more he discussed the matter, and the more he read and heard about the proposed Convention Bill the greater the harm he expected it would do if it were adopted for Queensland. Speaking generally about this bill and without dealing with any particular points of it he said it meant for Australia that all should pull together and every man be given a level show(?). But when one came to examine it, it really amounted to an agreement under which the people of Queensland were likely to be heavy losers. He would therefore caution them to stay their hands before signing that agreement. (Applause)It had been said that if Queensland did not come in as an original State they would lose a better opportunity that they would ever have later on. He did not consider that would be so. Because Queensland was one of the richest colonies of Australia and could get along right enough by herself if she did not federate. But then he believed that if Queensland stood out New South Wales would scarcely be likely to long continue in the federation body. Proceeding to quote a few statistics Mr Stephens said the total national debt of Queensland was £33,500,000 and the annual interest on that sum was £1,270,000. According to the Convention Bill they proposed to take our Customs from us. They were supposed to give us back three-fourths of them. It would more probably be three-fifths. Out total Customs receipts for the year 1895 were £1,300,000. Of this sum £300,000 was collected on products from other colonies and therefore with inter-colonial free trade that sum would be lost. We would also lose two-fifths of the general Customs but retain our debt and the annual interest on it as before, so that it must be clear that we would have to raise more revenue, and in some considerable amount, if federation was accepted. The money for this federation business would have to be found somewhere or somehow, and we should have to find a good share of the sum total. Then it was only likely enough that a considerable portion of this additional revenue which Queensland would have to raise would be spent out of the colony, and at the same time its people would have to compete with the people down South when the Queensland protectionist tariff was removed. This would hit them hard. Federation had said Australians would become one great nation, but whether they became federated or not they would still be Britishers and would be as well off as ever. (Cheers) He then referred at some length to the question of duty on leather. He said that there was no duty of 4d. per lb. on leather as had been stated, but all kinds could come in free now. The only duty there was, was on ignorance, and he was prepared to prove it. In conclusion he remarked that they had got the control of their country in their hands now, and exhorted them to keep it and not hand over to other people to do what they liked with.
Mr Lesina M.L.A. next spoke saying that though he opposed the present bill he did not necessarily oppose the principle of union, and of federal action for common purposes. The spirit of the time in the scattered States of Australian was growing in favour of union and certain lawyers, politicians and other persons were taking advantage of the feeling of the time by putting forward a bill which would benefit themselves rather than the people of Australia. It was a bad bill and drawn up in such a manner that there was no possible getting out of it once the neck was placed in the halter you were hanged. He thought that the federation as a rule appealed to sentiment- not reason. That night there was a big sentimental meeting at the Exhibition Building where the platform would be crowded with federal Australian natives wearing their federal blue ribbons and wildly cheering sentimental federal speeches, there would be found there Mr Dickson with his bald head and his federal halo- loud laughter- there would be the federal flag, the federal solos (Laughter). All these people would be rejoicing that they were to be citizens of a glorious great nation. Such a meeting as that would be raised to such a point that it would be capable of passing resolutions on any subject whatever. But it behoved sensible people to consider the question from a reasonable point of view and to beware of playing into the hands of grasping lawyers and big politicians. He considered the present bill had been copied from the American Constitution which had shattered the freedom of the American people. Under this bill the Senate would be the most powerful institution, which was not to be elected on proportionate voting. And this Senate was to be supreme which Sir Edward Braddon had declared would be the small States stronghold. Yes that was true: the minority would be able to rule. The underlying principle of every democratic constitution was the right of the majority of the people to rule. But according to the bill that would be utterly impossible for the Senate would be able to force its ideas on the Government of the country. He trusted the citizens of Queensland would look well after their rights, and be sure and reject such an unfair and ill- constructed bill.
Mr Stephens proposed and Mr Lesina seconded a motion- “That this meeting, whilst sympathizing with the abstract principle of federation is opposed to the basis of federation as laid down in the present bill.”
The resolution was put and carried unanimously, and the meeting then separated.
Brisbane Courier, Thurs 5 Oct 1899 p7
PROPOSED WEST END RECREATIONAL RESERVE
Conference at South Brisbane
Messrs H Turley M.L.A., W. Stephens M.L.A. F. Hamilton, G. Scholfield…. R Ross, secretary-members of the West End Recreation Reserve Committee- were introduced to the Mayor of South Brisbane (Mr P. Nott) and Aldermen Fisk, McDougall and Dibley, M.L.A. yesterday by Alderman Davies, a member of the committee, for the purpose of conferring on the question of purchasing the necessary land.
Alderman Davies pointed to the necessity for grounds for recreation purposes: that Musgrave Park was not suitable for sports, and that the ground proposed to be purchased at West End was most suitable. As the Government had sold the land wrongfully in the first place, it was their duty to make restitution, and he was given to understand they would do so if they were properly approached.
The Mayor said it was useless to go in for arguments in favour of open space; the council were just as fully seized with that as the deputation. What they wanted was some definite information of the price of a piece of land which it was considered would suit the requirements. The Finance Committee had no such offer before them. Could the deputation give the price for the land bought by the Soap Company, and that on which the houses were built. The council had to consider the matter from a financial standpoint. As to the purchase by the Government, he was a little skeptical. The question, however, was what land was to be offered and at what price.
Mr Hamilton said it was unquestionable that the ladn was bounded by the river. In regard to the land bought by the Soap Company, Mr Forrest had informed him he would facilitate the matter in every way, and that he would be satisfied to give the land for what it cost the company. This was verbal. There was no other such piece of ground in South Brisbane, and the council had as yet reserve on the river. He mentioned that the land had been offered at £275 per acre; and a new offer had been received for the area owned by Mr P. Hardgrave at £4,082 (?).
Some discussion took place on the question of the exact area of the land, about which there was a difference.
Mr Turley estimated the cost of the land at £4,400, of which the Government would give £2,200. The remainder of the money would probably be lent by the Government. He thought the council would be able to get this money on the longest term….. etc.
The Mayor said the deputation to the Premier did not get an offer from the Government of half the purchase money. But he (the Mayor) went privately to Mr Dickson, who informed him the Government would give half the money. At least he would place that amount on the Estimates.
There was a considerable amount of discussion on the question of area. Members of the Sports Committee desired to know if the council would not go on to secure the sixteen acres, without either one or the other corner. The members of the committee said they were prepared to accept the land, even if they could not get the Soap Company’s land. In the course of the discussion, Alderman Fisk said he would oppose the movement unless the Soap Company’s land was secured; but he Mayor said he would not be stopped even by the impossibility of getting that land, On the other hand, the deputation showed that this particular piece was available for purchase.
Mr Stephens desired to het a definite statement from the alderman; but the Mayor pointed out that the alderman had no power to bind the whole council.
Alderman Dibley said he agreed with the necessity for open space; and the securing of the land would be only the first portion of the expense. The streets were in a very bad state, and needed much expenditure. The indebtedness of the council was now £100,000 and if improvements were to be carried out the ratepayers would have to agree to more rating. He would not oppose the matter; but sportsmen should recognize what any extra expense meant to the council.
Mr Scholfield mentioned in his speech that the committee had agreed that the land would be suitable even without both corners.
The Mayor said the council ws asked to bear half the expense, and as some of the aldermen considered that at least one corner was needed their opinions should receive some respect.
Alderman Fish said, as chairman of the Finance Committee, he had to watch the interests of the council. In the first place they had to get definite information of the area and of the cost; the former of which had never been given yet. Personally he had considered that the Soap Company’s land should be secured. Then there was the anomaly that while the Local Works Lands Act gave power to borrow money for recreation grounds, the amending bill did not provide for lending money for such purposes. Until the present, they had not been informed what the land would cost. The council was in such a financial position that they had to go very carefully. They had power to borrow money privately and had secured about £15,000 at 4 per cent. Now, the Government proposed to lend money at that rate and the question came is how far reaching this would be.
The ratepayers ought to be informed of the position. What they had to consider was, with a revenue practically stationary, could they go into increased expenditure? As to the promises of assistance, so far the guarantee was only a promise. What he wished to impress, however, was that the matter was not so easily of accomplishment as it was believed to be,
IT was agreed that the offer of the land should be placed in writing before the Finance Committee, and the proceedings closed.
Brisbane Courier, Mon 29 Jan 1900 p3
SOUTH BRISBANE
The official nomination of candidates for the South Brisbane Municipal elections took place at noon of Saturday, Alderman W. Jones, returning officer presiding. The present Mayor (Mr Philip Nott), B. Bubbidge, and G. Blockridge were unopposed and declared duly elected as aldermen.
Brisbane Courier, Tues 30 Jan 1900 p4
SOUTH BRISBANE LODGING-HOUSES
At the fortnightly meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council yesterday afternoon, the following report of the Legislative Committee was read and adopted:- Present- the Mayor (Alderman Philip Nott), in the chair, Aldermen John Garsden and John Davies. Your committee are of opinion that the time has arrived for framing regulations for the better management of common lodging-houses and houses let in lodgings within the municipality. Up to the present time these houses have been dealt with directly under Parts IV, V, of the Health Act of 1884.
Brisbane Courier, Wed 4 April 1900 p6
EPIDEMIC JOINT BOARD
A special sub-committee of the Joint Health Board, appointed to consider the matter of Governmental assistance, met in the Mayor’s Room, Town Hall, yesterday afternoon, there being present- the Mayor (Alderman J. Nicol Robinson), president of the board; Alderman Philip Nott and Mr E. Macarthney, president of the Ithaca Shire Council. The question of the amount of monetary assistance to be asked from the Government was considered in committee, and the result will be submitted to the Home Secretary in due course.
Brisbane Courier, Tues 13 November 1900 p6
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
MAYOR GARSDEN’S ACTION
ALDERMEN PROTEST
It will have been noticed that trouble was caused on the Works committee of the South Brisbane Municipal Council by Alderman Blocksidge having addressed certain alleged libelous references to Alderman Davies- which matted is to be investigated by the law courts. As a result it has been found impossible to get the Works Committee together, and the Mayor would seem to have essayed to surmount the difficulty by summoning a meeting of the Committee of the Whole Council to transact the Works Committee business. The meeting was called for 3 p.m. yesterday, but the meeting was not held, for the reasons set forth in the following letter which has been sent to the Mayor by the aldermen whose names are attached:-
South Brisbane 12th November 1900
His Worship the Mayor, South Brisbane.
Dear Mr Mayor- You have sent us notices calling a committee meeting of the whole council to consider matters referred to but nor dealt with by the Works Committee.
We think this to be illegal because there is no provision in law for calling such committee meeting, and inconvenient because experience shows that four members (which compose the Works Committee) can more effectively consider details of proposals than twelve can.
Therefore we cannot attend the meeting called for to-day, and further, that in our opinion Mr Alderman Davies should not resign his position on the Works Committee. – Yours truly,
Signed Philip Nott, James Duncan, J. Davies, Aldermen No. 1 Ward.
William Jones, Michael Foley, Benjamin Babbidge, Aldermen No. 4 Ward.
A Committee meeting of the whole council was called by the Mayor yesterday afternoon, but only the Mayor and Aldermen Blocksidge, McDougall and Currie- “the progressive party”- as the latter said, put in an appearance. The meeting therefore lapsed for want of a quorum.
Brisbane Courier, Fri 28 Dec 1900 p2
SOUTH BRISBANE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
PROTESTS FROM ALDERMAN NOTT AND JONES
There would still appear to be difficulty in South Brisbane. A meeting of the Finance Committee was called for Friday last to consider certain matters sent to it by the council. There were, however, only Alderman Nott and Jones, with the Mayor, present, so the meeting lapsed for want of a quorum. On Saturday, so it is averred, a private meeting was called, from which certain aldermen, however, were excluded. The meeting does not appear to have cared to risk taking any action, for on the following Monday this notice was sent out for a meeting on that day:- Business: 1. The consideration of voting a sum of money, in conjunction with the Brisbane Municipal Council, for decorating and illuminating the city on 1st January 1901, and on the occasion of the visit of the Imperial troops and the Duke and Duchess of York. 2. Consideration of the question of expenses incurred by the council’s representatives in connection with the Commonwealth celebration in Sydney. 3. Leave of absence of the Mayor.
Our report of the proceedings disclosed the fact that the only business done was to grant the Mayor leave of absence, but in connection with the whole proceedings the following two letters of protest are interesting:-
Sir- I have received a notice issued by you calling a special meeting of the council for this day. Am sorry I cannot attend, as I consider the whole proceeding distinctly illegal. In the first place it is to consider a proposal to vote money for expenditure outside our boundaries; and in the second proposition, to vote a sum for the benefit of our noble selves. In all my experience I have never known such proposals to emanate from a Mayor, and emphatically decline to take any part in giving effect to them. We have at this particular time a bailiff out enforcing the payment of rates; no doubt in some cases causing great though perhaps unavoidable hardship. We have also very necessary works waiting for necessary funds. Therefore I protest emphatically against the whole proceeding and assure you that all who vote for such will be held liable by the ratepayers. I shall send a copy of this to the Press, together with the official notice, if not otherwise made public.
PHILIP NOTT, Alderman No 1 Ward, 24th December
Dear Mr Mayor- As it is inconvenient for me to attend a special meeting of the council this afternoon, I take this opportunity to state my views regarding the business for which it has been called.
1.The question of voting a sum of money towards the cost of carrying out the Commonwealth celebrations in Brisbane was referred by the council to the Finance Committee; therefore it will be most improper for the council to consider this question now before that committee has had time to bring up its report. Although the meeting of that committee, which was to have been held last Friday, lapsed for want of a quorum, I, being one of the two, then present, do not consider that failure sufficient to justify the council in now taking the matter into its consideration.
2. For the council to make a money grant to defray expenses of some of its members while visiting Sydney, with the occasion of which the council has nothing to do, and when the funds of the council are and likely to be for a considerable time so unsatisfactory, and the needs of the municipality are so numerous and so great, will be a curious and a most irregular transaction against which I strongly protest.
I am yours very truly,
WILLIAM JONES. Alderman No 4 Ward, South Brisbane 24th December 1900
Brisbane Courier, Mon 10 Feb 1901 p2
SOUTH BRISBANE
A meeting of the South Brisbane Municipal Council took place at the Town Hall, Vulture Street, at noon on Saturday for the purpose of electing the Mayor for the ensuing municipal year. There were present Aldermen W. Stephens M.L.A. (Mayor), A Lang, P. Nott, John Garsden, Wm Jones, G. Fish, J. McDougall, J. Davies, R. Babbidge, G. Bloscksidge and G. Schofield.
(Each year, the election of the position of mayor seemed to be very contentious with the aldermen evenly divided in their loyalties in some years, making the selection process difficult.)
Brisbane Courier, Sat 31 January 1903 p16
TO THE RATEPAYERS OF NO.1 WARD
For twenty-one years I have represented you in the South Brisbane Council and Woolloongabba Board, and during that time have diligently and faithfully cared for your requirements in all parts of the Ward, and have advocated the making of the roads, streets, drains, and all other improvements to best suit the residents and property owners generally, and in accordance with the available finances, which I have always zealously watched, and have at all times fearlessly remembered your interests while acting for the whole borough. My opponent does not disapprove of my policy or of my actions in general, his only objection to me is that I have served you too long. I am willing to serve you again, am now better able to do so than hitherto, and I herewith solicit your suffrages.
At the public meeting held by my opponent, attempt was made to prejudice my return by statements showing excessive expenditure in Westbourne-street, where my residence is. The following figures obtained from a return asked for by Alderman Babbidge will show what value ought to be placed on these statements:-
Westbourne-street rates collected since 1888…… £297.8.o
Westbourne-street, expenditure since 1888…….£128.12.4
Mr Bouchard’s informants know that what he said respecting the Mayorship is not wholly correct; they well know that I declined to be nominated. Where does selfishness then come in?
RATEPAYERS! VOTE AND SUPPORT YOUR TRIED REPRESENTATIVE
PHILIP NOTT
Brisbane Courier, Wed 4 Feb 1903 p5,6
SOUTH BRISBANE CONTEST
A VICTORY FOR NEW BLOOD
Polling in connection with the South Brisbane OCuncil annual elections began in a quiet way yesterday morning, and the interest was gradually working up during the day. There were three contested seats. For Mr P. Nott’s late seat in No. q1 Ward, Messrs Nott and T. Bouehard were the candidates. For Mr Blocksidge’s late seat etc.
The contests were waged fairly and honestly and the result, making due allowance for municipal apathy, should show that the nest men won on their merits.
The poll closed at 5 o’clock, and a start was at once made to arrive at the result of the voting. At the South Brisbane Town Hall, the office of the returing officer, a nmall but gradually increasing crowd gathered outside the gates, waiting for the declaration of the result. As the hour of of 6 approached, the presiding officers from the various booths arrived in haste, and it was soon known that Mr Bouchard had beaten Alderman Nott, and that Mr Lang had obtained a cvictory over Alderman Babbidge.
THE DECLARATION
The returning officer took his stand in the porch of the Town Hall shortly after 6 o’clock to declare the result, and at this time about 150 ratepayers were present. The function was attended with considerable display of enthusiasm. The result as follows, was received with applause:-
No. 1 Ward
West End School of Arts- Bouchard 150 Nott 81
Arcade Bouchard 187, Nott 105
Total Bouchard 377 Nott 186
Majority for Bouchard 191
Etc
The formal declaration that Messrs Bouchard, Blacksidge and Lang were elected to represent Nos 1, 3 and 4 Wards respectively in the South Brisbane Council for the ensuing term was then made. Alderman Garsden invited candidates to speak.
Alderman Bouchard was received with cheers. He spoke of his delight at the result of the poll, and thanked the ratepayers who had returned him by such a substantial majority. Those who had worked so assiduously for him also had his thanks; he was sure they would be as proud as he was at the result of their efforts. (Applause) He would make no specific promises, but would endeavor to work in the best interests not only of the ward he represented, but of the whole borough.
Alderman Blocksidge said it was especially gratifying to him, in view of the fact that he was the only old alderman re-elected out of the three who stood. Apparently, though the ratepayers strongly desired an infusion of new blood, they thought his blood was new enough. (Laughter)
Alderman Currie (Mayor) who had been elected unopposed for No. 2 Ward, took the opportunity of returning thanks for the honour of a unanimous election. After briefly touching on the events of the past year, Alderman Currie said he welcomed the new blood, belonging to the new brigade as he himself did. (Applause).
And this defeat signaled the end of Philip Nott’s political career. He was now aged 64 years, and entered a quiet retirement. During the next eight years he would lose four of his children, and his beloved wife Martha.
(NB. Alderman Nott is mentioned in numerous reports of the South Brisbane Municipal Council fortnightly meetings during his 21 year service.)
In 1932, a local resident/businessman from South Brisbane wrote a scathing letter to the Editor of the Telegraph, criticizing the Brisbane City Council and lamenting the loss of the South Brisbane councilors of the past:
Telegraph Brisbane Sat 27 feb 1932 p10
In 1932, a local resident/businessman from South Brisbane wrote a scathing letter to the Editor of the Telegraph, criticizing the Brisbane City Council and lamenting the loss of the South Brisbane councilors of the past:
Telegraph Brisbane Sat 27 feb 1932 p10
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
CRY FROM SOUTH BRISBANE
Sir, the personal trouble between Mr Macgroarty and Mr
Fry as regards the South Brisbane and Kurilpa seats is causing quite a little
concern. Now I do not ever remember either of these gentlemen doing anything
for the betterment of South Brisbane. For
that matter no man, either a member of the Government of City Council, has ever
done anything outstanding for South Brisbane since the days of John Hardgrave,
Thomas Heaslop, A.F. Luys, Philip Nott, William Jones, Thomas Scanlan, and a
few other of the hard-headed business men whose names for the moment I cannot
recall.
The above mentioned
men were one time members of the City of South Brisbane Council, who gave their
time and services free, not for personal gain. Under the then prevailing
conditions there men did their best for the people of South Brisbane. Certainly
there were no bitumen roads, but the valuations of properties were reasonable,
and the rates low.
However, the people were happy and contented, and a
prosperous business area existed in Stanley Street, from the Vulture Street
section to the Fiveways, Woolloongabba. The first blow which South Brisbane
received was when the passenger railway station was removed from Woolloongabba
to Melbourne Street. This was followed later by the great floods, which caused
havoc to the portion of South Brisbane from Sidon Street to Montague Road, and
the low-lying parts of West End. But the greatest blow of all was caused with
the advent of the Greater Brisbane Council, the latter a creation of the Labour
Government. Since the inception of this body, South Brisbane has gone down by
leaps and bounds, particularly in Stanley Street, from Vulture street to the
Fiveways. In the latter locality the business people were most shockingly and
scandalously treated beyond conception and never have I known such inconsideration
shown to ratepayers of any city in the Commonwealth.
Quite possibly this was only natural, for a number of
the members of this new Council have vested interests on the north side of the
river and the south side was a matter of indifference.
Etc.etc.
© B A Butler
Email contact: butler1802 @hotmail.com (no spaces)
Link back to Introduction page
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch1-introduction.html
Links to all other chapters on this blog:
Philip Nott and wife Martha Jane Wright- life and marriage in England
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch2-philip-nott-and-martha-jane-wright.html
Emigration to Australia in 1872
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch-3-emigration-to-australia.html
The Nott family settles in Brisbane, Queensland
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch4-settling-in-brisbane.html
Philip Nott- master builder in Brisbane
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch5-master-builder-in-brisbane.html
Philip Nott's community involvement
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch6-philip-nott-community-involvement_24.html
Philip Nott's political life as a Council alderman
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch7-philip-notts-political-life_24.html
Children of Philip Nott and Martha Jane Wright
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch8-issue-of-philip-and-martha-jane-nott_24.html
Philip Nott- family deaths and burials
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch9-philip-nott-family-deaths_25.html
Nott family ancestry in Cornwall England
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch10-nott-ancestry-cornwall_25.html
Martha Jane Wright's parents- Rev. John Bee Wright and Martha Rowling of Norfolk, and their ancestry
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch11-rev-john-bee-wright_25.html
Newspaper accounts of Rev. John Bee Wright, and emigration to New York State in 1871
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch12-rev-john-bee-wright-newspaper_25.html
Deaths, burials, and obituaries of Rev. John Bee Wright and Martha Wright
http://nott-wrightfamilyhistory.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/ch13-wright-and-rowling-ancestry.html